In this series, Fire Engineering Senior Editor Mary Jane Dittmar looks at the things that motivated and inspired instructors to present on their topics at FDIC International 2016. Segments will be posted on a regular basis up to and through the conference, April 18-23.

By Robert Burns

Battalion Chief (Ret.), Fire Department of New York

“Leadership in the Real World”

Monday, April 18, 1:30 p.m.-5:30 p.m.

The fire service must invest in leadership in the same way IT invests in self-contained breathing apparatus, hoselines, and ladders. Without the “tools” of leadership, we can’t influence behavior. Without effective influence, theories unimplemented are fiction and skills unpracticed are useless.  

I have seen many intelligent and dedicated fire service members develop safety policies and training programs designed to increase our effectiveness and reduce our work hazards. Hundreds of these programs are at FDIC every year. But in our organizations, many of these initiatives are never fully implemented or supported. Some never see the light of day. Others die a slow death from “cultural opposition” or neglect. We seem to be very good at planning and developing, but not at implementing and doing.  

Why? Do we need more technical training with our tools and equipment? No, since technical training opportunities have exploded in the past decade. Is it a lack of motivation to be safety-focused and professional? No. This motivation is everywhere—The Firefighter Life Safety Initiatives, The U.S. Fire Administration, Firefighter Close Calls, Firefighter Near Miss, etc., etc., etc.  

We need quality leadership training to provide our members with the “human skills” they need to effectively influence and lead others in their organizations. I have focused on this program because at the end of the week, we are all going back to the “real world,” the world where academic theories and textbook concepts collide with the realities of human nature and the fire service culture. My goal is to provide our students with the leadership skills that will pass the litmus test of real-world application, under real-world pressures, with real people--the skills that they will need to implement the “cutting edge” work done by the other instructors at FDIC international 2016.

In this series, Fire Engineering Senior Editor Mary Jane Dittmar looks at the things that motivated and inspired instructors to present on their topics at FDIC International 2016. Segments will be posted on a regular basis up to and through the conference, April 18-23.

By Adrian Cales

Fire Investigator, Bergen County Prosecutor’s Office
Past Chief, Paramus (NJ) Fire Department

“Fire Investigation Essentials: The Complete Fire Scene Examination”

Monday, April 18, 1:30 p.m.-5:30 p.m.

Fire investigation often has been a “forgotten stepchild” within the fire service. The evolution of the fire scene investigation for origin and cause has an all-new meaning since National Fire Protection Association 921, A Guide for Fire and Explosion Investigations. Most fire investigators thought of NFPA 921 more as a passing fancy than as a standard that would have longevity and a lasting impact on how fire investigations are conducted. The 2014 edition of NFPA 921 is very different from the versions of the 1980s, the 1990s, or even five or 10 years ago.

In addition, NFPA 1033, Standard for Professional Qualifications for Fire Investigator, and NFPA 1037, Standard on Fire Marshal Professional Qualifications, explain criteria for the qualification of fire investigators. Although NFPA 921 is still a “guide,” some areas of the country are pushing for the NFPA to adopt it as a “standard” as well.

Arson convictions have been overturned because they were based on the investigative methodology used at the time, which some now consider “junk science.” Before, fire investigation was all about eliminating everything that wasn’t the cause and, often, the investigator offering his opinion as to what he thought the cause was. It’s a whole different process now. This class is intended to bring the fire investigative community up to date on these changes so members can be prepared, ready, and qualified for the next investigation they conduct.

In this series, Fire Engineering Senior Editor Mary Jane Dittmar looks at the things that motivated and inspired instructors to present on their topics at FDIC International 2016. Segments will be posted on a regular basis up to and through the conference, April 18-23.

By Scott Kraut

Lieutenant, Fairfax County (VA) Fire and Resue Department - Fairfax, Virginia

“Constructing a Successful Training Program”

Monday, April 18, 8:00 a.m.-12:00 p.m.

The motivation for the session Captain Dave Barlow and I have been sharing at FDIC came from a distain for the current training environment in my department and probably across the fire service post-September 11, 2001.  The fire service lost interest, maybe rightly so, for a bit in firefighting basics as departments struggled to obtain federal funding by requiring its members to collect the various National Incident Management System and Federal Emergency Management Agency certifications.

The focus for many fire departments was on weapons of mass destruction (WMD), terrorism, and the specials operations training.  Of course, 2001 happened to be same year that Brother Bret Tarver of the Phoenix (AZ) Fire Department (PFD) died in the line of duty in the Southwest Supermarket Fire. His death led to extensive training by the PFD and the revelation that the fire service needed to improve its rapid intervention practices. For almost three years, we focused mainly on fireground survival and rapid intervention training--again maybe we needed to.

 We went almost five years forgetting about the basis of our existence. Don’t interpret my disdain for that learning/teaching environment as a lack of interest in that training, but my department went a bit overboard.

My department was placing ladder pipes in service on detached single-family dwellings regularly, and it wasn’t uncommon for us to return to quarters leaving behind only a foundation. We became protocol based, protected ourselves under the “safety umbrella,” and ceased to produce “thinking firefighters.” Our department had just failed to rescue a woman who was on the phone with dispatch for minutes after our arrival. It was just before Ray McCormick’s ‘Culture of Extinguishment’ keynote speech at FDIC.  

I along with a few trusted brothers began to try to unfold this mess we had created and felt that the task would be daunting.  But after extensive research in the application of adult learning as well as the physiological and psychological factors that affect our members’ ability to learn and accomplish the various tasks on the incident scene, we came to a simple solution. We offer this solution—really a roadmap to our success as a department--to FDIC attendees. The most optimal effect is that an organization is shown how to create thinking firefighters and for the individual to become the thinking firefighter.

Our class covers everything from how to instruct adult learners based on the culture and generational differences in today’s fire service and the body’s physiological and psychological response to the tasks we are required to perform on the fireground. In addition, and most importantly, students are shown how to apply these techniques to their training.

We have had many good responses to the session from various arenas of the fire service from safety and training to the boots on the ground and company officers.  Mostly, people are interested in how we pulled it off. We offer many solutions and share the template we used.