Menu

Welcome

The Finest Supporting the Bravest!

The purpose of the Fire Mechanics Section is to promote standardization of fire apparatus and equipment preventative maintenance, improve safety standards and practices, promote workshops, conferences, and seminars related to the purposes of this Section, and to promote cost savings through standardization of building and equipment purchasing and maintenance.

RECENT FIRE MECHANIC NEWS

Posted: Mar 1, 2019

Rekindle vs. Due Diligence

1903FA_058-059

 
 
Thermal Imaging | Manfred Kihn
 

Rekindle vs. Due Diligence

I read an article recently where a fire department is facing a $1.9-million lawsuit ... OUCH! How does that happen in today’s technology-driven society that has equipped the fire service with the most advanced tools for its firefighters?

Carl Nix

In this column, I’m going to discuss rekindle and due diligence and what steps the fire department could have taken to prevent this lawsuit from happening.

Let me summarize the details of the circumstances that occurred to elicit this lawsuit: A structure fire had occurred several streets over from the plaintiff’s residence, at which time some embers had ignited on the roof of the resident’s house at 1:40 a.m. The fire department had responded and extinguished the fire on the roof and with minimal damage the family could reenter and stay in their home. At 7:30 a.m., the homeowners woke to the roof being on fire and once again the fire department responded and extinguished the roof fire, but this time a more significant amount of damage occurred, making the home uninhabitable. At 7:15 p.m., the fire department was called for a third fire that had ignited from the same roof of the plaintiff’s home, causing the home to sustain even further damage.

In the court documents, the plaintiff alleged that the defendants:

  1. Failed to inspect all areas of the house where the possibility of the presence of a residual fire, remaining embers, or smoldering fuel might exist when they knew—or should have known—such a set of circumstances was likely to exist.
  2. Failed to ensure that the initial fire and rekindle were completely extinguished prior to leaving the house and handing over responsibility for the house to the plaintiffs.
  3. Failed to conduct a reasonable, or any, fire watch at the house following the initial fire and rekindle or otherwise failed to follow a reasonable, or any, deployment process so that a fire watch could be maintained.
  4. Failed to exercise reasonable care or take adequate, or any, precautions, such as maintaining a fire watch, in circumstances where the house had a high fuel load because of its old and dry cedar-shake roof, which they knew, or should have known, could be easily susceptible to a rekindle.

Now, what could the fire department have done to prevent this from happening by using due diligence? Firefighters could have used their thermal imaging camera (TIC). When the fire department responded the first time at 1:40 a.m., members should have used the TIC to conduct a 360° search around the structure based on information that the embers had ignited the roof from several streets away. The firefighters should have asked what else might have been burning that was not detected by the naked

Read more
Posted: Mar 1, 2019

Rekindle vs. Due Diligence

1903FA_058-059

 
 
Thermal Imaging | Manfred Kihn
 

Rekindle vs. Due Diligence

I read an article recently where a fire department is facing a $1.9-million lawsuit ... OUCH! How does that happen in today’s technology-driven society that has equipped the fire service with the most advanced tools for its firefighters?

Carl Nix

In this column, I’m going to discuss rekindle and due diligence and what steps the fire department could have taken to prevent this lawsuit from happening.

Let me summarize the details of the circumstances that occurred to elicit this lawsuit: A structure fire had occurred several streets over from the plaintiff’s residence, at which time some embers had ignited on the roof of the resident’s house at 1:40 a.m. The fire department had responded and extinguished the fire on the roof and with minimal damage the family could reenter and stay in their home. At 7:30 a.m., the homeowners woke to the roof being on fire and once again the fire department responded and extinguished the roof fire, but this time a more significant amount of damage occurred, making the home uninhabitable. At 7:15 p.m., the fire department was called for a third fire that had ignited from the same roof of the plaintiff’s home, causing the home to sustain even further damage.

In the court documents, the plaintiff alleged that the defendants:

  1. Failed to inspect all areas of the house where the possibility of the presence of a residual fire, remaining embers, or smoldering fuel might exist when they knew—or should have known—such a set of circumstances was likely to exist.
  2. Failed to ensure that the initial fire and rekindle were completely extinguished prior to leaving the house and handing over responsibility for the house to the plaintiffs.
  3. Failed to conduct a reasonable, or any, fire watch at the house following the initial fire and rekindle or otherwise failed to follow a reasonable, or any, deployment process so that a fire watch could be maintained.
  4. Failed to exercise reasonable care or take adequate, or any, precautions, such as maintaining a fire watch, in circumstances where the house had a high fuel load because of its old and dry cedar-shake roof, which they knew, or should have known, could be easily susceptible to a rekindle.

Now, what could the fire department have done to prevent this from happening by using due diligence? Firefighters could have used their thermal imaging camera (TIC). When the fire department responded the first time at 1:40 a.m., members should have used the TIC to conduct a 360° search around the structure based on information that the embers had ignited the roof from several streets away. The firefighters should have asked what else might have been burning that was not detected by the naked

Read more
Posted: Mar 1, 2019

Improving Skills in Water Application

1903FA_042-043

 
 
chief concerns | Richard Marinucci
 

Improving Skills in Water Application

Putting water on the fire quickly remains the best way to suppress almost all fires. It is one reason automatic sprinklers are so effective. They catch the fire while it is small enough to be controlled with minimal water.

Richard Marinucci

Water application may also be the best way to effect a rescue. It also improves firefighter safety by not only making conditions better but also shortening exposure time. Studies continue to show that conditions inside the structure improve dramatically when the environment is cooled. One feature of water is that it absorbs a great deal of heat when converting to steam. Of course, the steam can cause discomfort to interior firefighters. The key to being successful is applying the right amount of water in the quickest possible way. This is true whether you are in the offensive or defensive mode or in a transitional attack.

Water application involves a source, pump (unless you are still in the bucket brigade mode!), hoses and appliances, staffing, and the skill level of firefighting companies. Engine companies are generally tasked with water application, especially in the early stages of a fire. Trucks may assume the role, particularly in defensive operations. Essentially, the challenge is to overcome the Btus being generated by the fire. In the fire growth model, the fire begins in the incipient stage and builds to its peak and then deteriorates. There can be a vent-limited phase and explosive fire growth in modern fires with modern contents. Regardless, the point is that water application must match the phase of the fire. In some cases, the fire can be extinguished during the growth phase and in others the declining phase. Getting the right amount of water in the moments that matter will be the determinant.

TRAINING

Anyone who has ever read any of my columns on a regular basis knows that I think training is the most important aspect of any operation, and the more an organization commits to regular, quality training, the better the outcomes regardless of which part of the job you are involved in. For water delivery, it requires competence in hose deployment, nozzle usage, and appliances. The size of the hose, including attack and supply lines, is an important consideration. Staffing will also affect operations including efficiencies. One question to ask yourself is, “How long can I expect it to take to get water flowing from the various lines carried on the engine?” There must be an established standard, and crews must be held to that standard. This varies by line size and staffing. For example, more people are required to advance a 2½-inch line than a 1¾-inch line. If maneuverability is an issue, this has to be considered in the decision making. This would also apply to supply lines. If a good estimate is made, better decisions will be made. The choices can vary based on the amount of fire showing, water needs, and the time needed to deploy lines. A smaller line may make sense based on these factors and the need to be more mobile in moving lines. If you know some of t

Read more
Posted: Mar 1, 2019

Improving Skills in Water Application

1903FA_042-043

 
 
chief concerns | Richard Marinucci
 

Improving Skills in Water Application

Putting water on the fire quickly remains the best way to suppress almost all fires. It is one reason automatic sprinklers are so effective. They catch the fire while it is small enough to be controlled with minimal water.

Richard Marinucci

Water application may also be the best way to effect a rescue. It also improves firefighter safety by not only making conditions better but also shortening exposure time. Studies continue to show that conditions inside the structure improve dramatically when the environment is cooled. One feature of water is that it absorbs a great deal of heat when converting to steam. Of course, the steam can cause discomfort to interior firefighters. The key to being successful is applying the right amount of water in the quickest possible way. This is true whether you are in the offensive or defensive mode or in a transitional attack.

Water application involves a source, pump (unless you are still in the bucket brigade mode!), hoses and appliances, staffing, and the skill level of firefighting companies. Engine companies are generally tasked with water application, especially in the early stages of a fire. Trucks may assume the role, particularly in defensive operations. Essentially, the challenge is to overcome the Btus being generated by the fire. In the fire growth model, the fire begins in the incipient stage and builds to its peak and then deteriorates. There can be a vent-limited phase and explosive fire growth in modern fires with modern contents. Regardless, the point is that water application must match the phase of the fire. In some cases, the fire can be extinguished during the growth phase and in others the declining phase. Getting the right amount of water in the moments that matter will be the determinant.

TRAINING

Anyone who has ever read any of my columns on a regular basis knows that I think training is the most important aspect of any operation, and the more an organization commits to regular, quality training, the better the outcomes regardless of which part of the job you are involved in. For water delivery, it requires competence in hose deployment, nozzle usage, and appliances. The size of the hose, including attack and supply lines, is an important consideration. Staffing will also affect operations including efficiencies. One question to ask yourself is, “How long can I expect it to take to get water flowing from the various lines carried on the engine?” There must be an established standard, and crews must be held to that standard. This varies by line size and staffing. For example, more people are required to advance a 2½-inch line than a 1¾-inch line. If maneuverability is an issue, this has to be considered in the decision making. This would also apply to supply lines. If a good estimate is made, better decisions will be made. The choices can vary based on the amount of fire showing, water needs, and the time needed to deploy lines. A smaller line may make sense based on these factors and the need to be more mobile in moving lines. If you know some of t

Read more
RSS
First21522153215421552157215921602161Last

Theme picker

Upcoming Events

Theme picker

Sponsors

Fire Mechanics Section Board

Chair

Posted: Oct 21, 2015

Chair

Elliot Courage
North Whatcom Fire & Rescue
Read more

Vice Chair

Posted: Oct 21, 2015

Vice Chair

Mike Smith 
Pierce County Fire District #5
Read more

Secretary

Posted: Oct 21, 2015

Secretary

Greg Bach
South Snohomish County Fire & Rescue
Read more

Director #1

Posted: Oct 21, 2015

Director #1

Doug Jones
South Kitsap Fire & Rescue
Read more

Director #2

Posted: Oct 21, 2015

Director #2

Paul Spencer 
Fire Fleet Maintenance LLC
Read more

Director #3

Posted: Oct 21, 2015

Director #3

Jim Morris
Mountain View Fire Department
Read more

Director #4

Posted: Oct 21, 2015

Director #4

Arnie Kuchta

Clark County Fire District 6

Read more

Director #6

Posted: Oct 21, 2015

Director #6

Brett Annear
Kitsap County Fire District 18
Read more

Director #5

Posted: Oct 21, 2015

Director #5

Jay Jacks
Camano Island Fire & Rescue
Read more

Legislative Representative

Posted: Oct 21, 2015

Legislative Representative

TBD
TBD
Read more

Immediate Past Chair

Posted: Oct 20, 2015

Immediate Past Chair

Brian Fortner
Graham Fire & Rescue

Read more
RSS

Theme picker

2020 CAR SHOW