Menu

Welcome

The Finest Supporting the Bravest!

The purpose of the Fire Mechanics Section is to promote standardization of fire apparatus and equipment preventative maintenance, improve safety standards and practices, promote workshops, conferences, and seminars related to the purposes of this Section, and to promote cost savings through standardization of building and equipment purchasing and maintenance.

RECENT FIRE MECHANIC NEWS

Posted: Jan 26, 2018

PPE Performance Enhanced by Improved Fabrics

While personal protective equipment (PPE) manufacturers continue to refine turnout gear for safety, comfort, and ergonomics, manufacturers of the fabrics that make up that gear are turning out new and improved products that enhance the overall performance of the PPE.

DuPont

Jian Xiang, global technology leader for Fire Service DuPont Protection Solutions, points out that DuPont’s™ Nomex® and Kevlar® fibers primarily are used in all three layers of turnout gear. She notes that a minimum of 70 percent of the fibers are in typical PPE.

1 DuPont™ Nomex® Nano submicron fiber, in the background, is a hundred times smaller than a human hair, at left foreground. (Photo courtesy of DuPont.)

1 DuPont™ Nomex® Nano submicron fiber, in the background, is a hundred times smaller than a human hair, at left foreground. (Photo courtesy of DuPont.)

Jeff Fackler, DuPont’s business development manager for North American fire service, says that DuPont Protection Solutions makes hundreds of different types of Nomex and Kevlar fibers that fabric mills make into hundreds of different fabrics. “We make the fibers that are the backbone of turnout gear in both long filaments and staple fibers,” Fackler says. “For example, Kevlar fibers are used for the majority of the straps on self-contained breathing apparatus. Nomex provides heat and flame protection and outstanding durability, while Kevlar provides strength and light weight in almost all of the firefighters’ PPE.”

2 W.L Gore and Associates Inc. makes Parallon™, a moisture barrier liner system of three layers that takes the place of a traditional moisture barrier and thermal liner in a single system. (Photo courtesy of W.L Gore and Associates Inc.)

2 W.L Gore and Associates Inc. makes Parallon™, a moisture barrier liner system of three layers that takes the place of a traditional moisture barrier and thermal liner in a single system. (Photo courtesy of W.L Gore and Associates Inc.)

Xiang notes that, with the exception of Nomex Nano, Nomex Nano Flex®, and thermal liner spun lace, DuPont markets its technology to fabric mills, which make the fabrics for PPE construction as well as webbing and other materials. She adds that the Nano name comes about because the fiber is at a submicron level that is a hundred times smaller than a human hair. “Because it’s such a smaller filament, a given volume creates a large surface area and is very light,” she says. “Nomex Nano Flex uses the same technology but is elastic in one direction that allows it to be used in areas where stretch is needed, like cuffs, hoods, and gloves.”

3 Globe by MSA worked with TenCate on its Kombat™ Stretch, an outer shell fabric made from a blend of PBI®/Kevlar® that allows a less bulky fit and a greater range of motions, as shown o
	</div>
	<a class=Read more
Posted: Jan 26, 2018

Effective Radiation Detection Equipment for Fire Departments

fire industry today Scott Masiella
 

In small towns and large cities alike, fire crews, hazmat teams, and other emergency personnel are often first on the scene where radiation could be present. Frequently, they are walking into extremely dangerous situations without knowing how much or what type of radiation is present.

These first responders must be able to identify potential radiation risks and then determine the source quickly and accurately to implement a proper safety plan. Emergency personnel responding to an accident need answers to several questions. First, “Is there radiation present?” If the answer is yes, they immediately need to ask, “What type of radiation is it, and how long is it safe to stay at the accident site?” The answers to these questions can impact health and safety, and innovative technology is essential to enable them to protect themselves and the public.

Potential Scenarios, Real Risks

A truck rolls along an interstate on its way to a low-level radioactive waste disposal facility. As it passes through a small town, a dangerous thunderstorm hits, and the truck overturns. The driver is unconscious. The containment system is damaged. First responders from the small county fire department race to the scene.

A fire starts in a hospital. A fast-responding fire unit is unaware of an X-ray machine or less obvious radiation or irradiation source nearby.

In both situations, critical questions with serious ramifications must be answered quickly and reliably.

In the case of the overturned truck, are the emergency response personnel equipped with the proper tools to quickly and reliably determine what type and quantity of hazardous waste material the truck is carrying, how best to clean it up, and how to establish an appropriate safety perimeter? If the answers are no, this scenario may lead to serious consequences—for the unconscious driver, the emergency response unit, and an unknown number of other potentially affected individuals.

In the case of the hospital fire, responders are equipped with a multigas detector to determine what personal protective equipment (PPE) is needed, but do they have the right technology to quickly detect radiation? Further, can they determine the source and whether the containment system has been compromised? Can they accurately verify the isotope, establish an appropriate safety perimeter, and determine how long they can stay there safely? If radiation is exposed and continues to disperse while crews have to wait for a bomb squad with the proper equipment, the threat to health and life may be significant.

The newest handheld personal radiation detectors (PRDs) can detect radiation, identify the class of radioactive agent, and identify the actual isotope present to provide quick and accurate answers. These analytical devices are highly sensitive and accurate, combining both gamma and neutron detection. Advanced technology can analyze the radiation field and immediately differentiate between artificial and natural radiation, eliminating nuisance alarms that can be generated by nonthreatening radiation sources. Certain PRDs are also ATEX-certified as “intrinsically safe” for use in and around flammable and potentially explosive atmospheres.

Detection Capability Alone Provides Insufficient Protection

Once first responders know that radiation is present and that the type requires further investigation, they need to quickly identify the source and the actual isotope, measure the amount,

Read more
Posted: Jan 26, 2018

Effective Radiation Detection Equipment for Fire Departments

fire industry today Scott Masiella
 

In small towns and large cities alike, fire crews, hazmat teams, and other emergency personnel are often first on the scene where radiation could be present. Frequently, they are walking into extremely dangerous situations without knowing how much or what type of radiation is present.

These first responders must be able to identify potential radiation risks and then determine the source quickly and accurately to implement a proper safety plan. Emergency personnel responding to an accident need answers to several questions. First, “Is there radiation present?” If the answer is yes, they immediately need to ask, “What type of radiation is it, and how long is it safe to stay at the accident site?” The answers to these questions can impact health and safety, and innovative technology is essential to enable them to protect themselves and the public.

Potential Scenarios, Real Risks

A truck rolls along an interstate on its way to a low-level radioactive waste disposal facility. As it passes through a small town, a dangerous thunderstorm hits, and the truck overturns. The driver is unconscious. The containment system is damaged. First responders from the small county fire department race to the scene.

A fire starts in a hospital. A fast-responding fire unit is unaware of an X-ray machine or less obvious radiation or irradiation source nearby.

In both situations, critical questions with serious ramifications must be answered quickly and reliably.

In the case of the overturned truck, are the emergency response personnel equipped with the proper tools to quickly and reliably determine what type and quantity of hazardous waste material the truck is carrying, how best to clean it up, and how to establish an appropriate safety perimeter? If the answers are no, this scenario may lead to serious consequences—for the unconscious driver, the emergency response unit, and an unknown number of other potentially affected individuals.

In the case of the hospital fire, responders are equipped with a multigas detector to determine what personal protective equipment (PPE) is needed, but do they have the right technology to quickly detect radiation? Further, can they determine the source and whether the containment system has been compromised? Can they accurately verify the isotope, establish an appropriate safety perimeter, and determine how long they can stay there safely? If radiation is exposed and continues to disperse while crews have to wait for a bomb squad with the proper equipment, the threat to health and life may be significant.

The newest handheld personal radiation detectors (PRDs) can detect radiation, identify the class of radioactive agent, and identify the actual isotope present to provide quick and accurate answers. These analytical devices are highly sensitive and accurate, combining both gamma and neutron detection. Advanced technology can analyze the radiation field and immediately differentiate between artificial and natural radiation, eliminating nuisance alarms that can be generated by nonthreatening radiation sources. Certain PRDs are also ATEX-certified as “intrinsically safe” for use in and around flammable and potentially explosive atmospheres.

Detection Capability Alone Provides Insufficient Protection

Once first responders know that radiation is present and that the type requires further investigation, they need to quickly identify the source and the actual isotope, measure the amount,

Read more
Posted: Jan 26, 2018

Effective Radiation Detection Equipment for Fire Departments

fire industry today Scott Masiella
 

In small towns and large cities alike, fire crews, hazmat teams, and other emergency personnel are often first on the scene where radiation could be present. Frequently, they are walking into extremely dangerous situations without knowing how much or what type of radiation is present.

These first responders must be able to identify potential radiation risks and then determine the source quickly and accurately to implement a proper safety plan. Emergency personnel responding to an accident need answers to several questions. First, “Is there radiation present?” If the answer is yes, they immediately need to ask, “What type of radiation is it, and how long is it safe to stay at the accident site?” The answers to these questions can impact health and safety, and innovative technology is essential to enable them to protect themselves and the public.

Potential Scenarios, Real Risks

A truck rolls along an interstate on its way to a low-level radioactive waste disposal facility. As it passes through a small town, a dangerous thunderstorm hits, and the truck overturns. The driver is unconscious. The containment system is damaged. First responders from the small county fire department race to the scene.

A fire starts in a hospital. A fast-responding fire unit is unaware of an X-ray machine or less obvious radiation or irradiation source nearby.

In both situations, critical questions with serious ramifications must be answered quickly and reliably.

In the case of the overturned truck, are the emergency response personnel equipped with the proper tools to quickly and reliably determine what type and quantity of hazardous waste material the truck is carrying, how best to clean it up, and how to establish an appropriate safety perimeter? If the answers are no, this scenario may lead to serious consequences—for the unconscious driver, the emergency response unit, and an unknown number of other potentially affected individuals.

In the case of the hospital fire, responders are equipped with a multigas detector to determine what personal protective equipment (PPE) is needed, but do they have the right technology to quickly detect radiation? Further, can they determine the source and whether the containment system has been compromised? Can they accurately verify the isotope, establish an appropriate safety perimeter, and determine how long they can stay there safely? If radiation is exposed and continues to disperse while crews have to wait for a bomb squad with the proper equipment, the threat to health and life may be significant.

The newest handheld personal radiation detectors (PRDs) can detect radiation, identify the class of radioactive agent, and identify the actual isotope present to provide quick and accurate answers. These analytical devices are highly sensitive and accurate, combining both gamma and neutron detection. Advanced technology can analyze the radiation field and immediately differentiate between artificial and natural radiation, eliminating nuisance alarms that can be generated by nonthreatening radiation sources. Certain PRDs are also ATEX-certified as “intrinsically safe” for use in and around flammable and potentially explosive atmospheres.

Detection Capability Alone Provides Insufficient Protection

Once first responders know that radiation is present and that the type requires further investigation, they need to quickly identify the source and the actual isotope, measure the amount,

Read more
RSS
First29862987298829892991299329942995Last

Theme picker

Upcoming Events

Theme picker

Sponsors

Fire Mechanics Section Board

Chair

Posted: Oct 21, 2015

Chair

Elliot Courage
North Whatcom Fire & Rescue
Read more

Vice Chair

Posted: Oct 21, 2015

Vice Chair

Mike Smith 
Pierce County Fire District #5
Read more

Secretary

Posted: Oct 21, 2015

Secretary

Greg Bach
South Snohomish County Fire & Rescue
Read more

Director #1

Posted: Oct 21, 2015

Director #1

Doug Jones
South Kitsap Fire & Rescue
Read more

Director #2

Posted: Oct 21, 2015

Director #2

Paul Spencer 
Fire Fleet Maintenance LLC
Read more

Director #3

Posted: Oct 21, 2015

Director #3

Jim Morris
Mountain View Fire Department
Read more

Director #4

Posted: Oct 21, 2015

Director #4

Arnie Kuchta

Clark County Fire District 6

Read more

Director #6

Posted: Oct 21, 2015

Director #6

Brett Annear
Kitsap County Fire District 18
Read more

Director #5

Posted: Oct 21, 2015

Director #5

Jay Jacks
Camano Island Fire & Rescue
Read more

Legislative Representative

Posted: Oct 21, 2015

Legislative Representative

TBD
TBD
Read more

Immediate Past Chair

Posted: Oct 20, 2015

Immediate Past Chair

Brian Fortner
Graham Fire & Rescue

Read more
RSS

Theme picker

2020 CAR SHOW