Menu

WFC News

Posted: Dec 20, 2017

More Departments Choose Smaller Fire Apparatus to Handle Typical Runs

Many fire departments around the country are moving toward smaller fire apparatus to handle emergency medical services (EMS) runs and nonstructure fire calls to lighten the load that’s been placed on first-due engine and truck companies.

Ford F-550-chassis-sized vehicles are becoming popular in that role, meaning fewer hourly operating costs, reduced maintenance costs, and savings in wear and tear on the larger fire apparatus.

Joe Messmer, president of Summit Fire Apparatus, says that when fire departments go to a smaller chassis vehicle, “It’s mostly to lighten the load on engines and aerials that are running on EMS calls. They are having us build rescues on Ford F-550-size vehicles that can handle popping a vehicle’s door and assisting other EMS units.” Messmer notes Summit also has built such rescues on Ford F-450 chassis as well as on Dodge 4500 and 5500 chassis. “With squads, we build an enclosed utility rescue body with six compartments that can be customized for the application the department wants, whether more rescue or more medical.”

1 Alexis Fire Equipment Company built this squad for the Lewistown (IL) Fire Protection District on a Ford F-550 chassis with a four-door cab. (Photo courtesy of Alexis Fire Equipment Company.)

1 Alexis Fire Equipment Company built this squad for the Lewistown (IL) Fire Protection District on a Ford F-550 chassis with a four-door cab. (Photo courtesy of Alexis Fire Equipment Company.)

Cost Factor

Jeff Morris, president of Alexis Fire Equipment Company, points out that economics can be a driving factor when a department chooses a small-chassis vehicle. “The economy is still having an effect on budgets,” Morris observes, “and with the cost of running big rigs out on every call, many departments are looking toward smaller vehicles, which cost less and are easier to maneuver. Departments are comparing $185,000 to $210,000 for a smaller chassis vehicle to a Type 1 custom pumper that costs between $450,000 and $600,000.”

Todd Nix, apparatus consultant for Unruh Fire, echoes the issue of budget restraints having an effect on cities and fire departments. “Many of them are making changes to enhance their response while trimming their budget and lowering operating costs,” Nix says. “That’s where the smaller apparatus come in, which is basically our bread and butter. And, staffing is definitely a part of the trend where across the country volunteer fire departments are seeing fewer firefighters show up. They don’t want one or two firefighters on a full-size pumper to an EMS call when they can jump into a smaller vehicle and do it safely.”

Small Vehicles and Staffing

Brian Connely, account manager for Spartan ER, points out that many departments are trying to squeeze all the equipment from a traditional pumper into a smaller unit. “They want a rig that can be used for an EMS squad, at a motor vehicle accident (MVA) rescue, and for wildland fires,” Connely says. “The cost of ownership is one of the reasons, both for the initial cost and the cost of operation, as well as because of staffing issues. We’ve seen this happen all over the country, very often in rural volunteer departments, but also with some career departments too.”

Mark Brenneman, engineer for 4 Guys Fire Trucks, concurs that the ex

Read more
Posted: Dec 20, 2017

More Departments Choose Smaller Fire Apparatus to Handle Typical Runs

Many fire departments around the country are moving toward smaller fire apparatus to handle emergency medical services (EMS) runs and nonstructure fire calls to lighten the load that’s been placed on first-due engine and truck companies.

Ford F-550-chassis-sized vehicles are becoming popular in that role, meaning fewer hourly operating costs, reduced maintenance costs, and savings in wear and tear on the larger fire apparatus.

Joe Messmer, president of Summit Fire Apparatus, says that when fire departments go to a smaller chassis vehicle, “It’s mostly to lighten the load on engines and aerials that are running on EMS calls. They are having us build rescues on Ford F-550-size vehicles that can handle popping a vehicle’s door and assisting other EMS units.” Messmer notes Summit also has built such rescues on Ford F-450 chassis as well as on Dodge 4500 and 5500 chassis. “With squads, we build an enclosed utility rescue body with six compartments that can be customized for the application the department wants, whether more rescue or more medical.”

1 Alexis Fire Equipment Company built this squad for the Lewistown (IL) Fire Protection District on a Ford F-550 chassis with a four-door cab. (Photo courtesy of Alexis Fire Equipment Company.)

1 Alexis Fire Equipment Company built this squad for the Lewistown (IL) Fire Protection District on a Ford F-550 chassis with a four-door cab. (Photo courtesy of Alexis Fire Equipment Company.)

Cost Factor

Jeff Morris, president of Alexis Fire Equipment Company, points out that economics can be a driving factor when a department chooses a small-chassis vehicle. “The economy is still having an effect on budgets,” Morris observes, “and with the cost of running big rigs out on every call, many departments are looking toward smaller vehicles, which cost less and are easier to maneuver. Departments are comparing $185,000 to $210,000 for a smaller chassis vehicle to a Type 1 custom pumper that costs between $450,000 and $600,000.”

Todd Nix, apparatus consultant for Unruh Fire, echoes the issue of budget restraints having an effect on cities and fire departments. “Many of them are making changes to enhance their response while trimming their budget and lowering operating costs,” Nix says. “That’s where the smaller apparatus come in, which is basically our bread and butter. And, staffing is definitely a part of the trend where across the country volunteer fire departments are seeing fewer firefighters show up. They don’t want one or two firefighters on a full-size pumper to an EMS call when they can jump into a smaller vehicle and do it safely.”

Small Vehicles and Staffing

Brian Connely, account manager for Spartan ER, points out that many departments are trying to squeeze all the equipment from a traditional pumper into a smaller unit. “They want a rig that can be used for an EMS squad, at a motor vehicle accident (MVA) rescue, and for wildland fires,” Connely says. “The cost of ownership is one of the reasons, both for the initial cost and the cost of operation, as well as because of staffing issues. We’ve seen this happen all over the country, very often in rural volunteer departments, but also with some career departments too.”

Mark Brenneman, engineer for 4 Guys Fire Trucks, concurs that the ex

Read more
Posted: Dec 20, 2017

More Departments Choose Smaller Fire Apparatus to Handle Typical Runs

Many fire departments around the country are moving toward smaller fire apparatus to handle emergency medical services (EMS) runs and nonstructure fire calls to lighten the load that’s been placed on first-due engine and truck companies.

Ford F-550-chassis-sized vehicles are becoming popular in that role, meaning fewer hourly operating costs, reduced maintenance costs, and savings in wear and tear on the larger fire apparatus.

Joe Messmer, president of Summit Fire Apparatus, says that when fire departments go to a smaller chassis vehicle, “It’s mostly to lighten the load on engines and aerials that are running on EMS calls. They are having us build rescues on Ford F-550-size vehicles that can handle popping a vehicle’s door and assisting other EMS units.” Messmer notes Summit also has built such rescues on Ford F-450 chassis as well as on Dodge 4500 and 5500 chassis. “With squads, we build an enclosed utility rescue body with six compartments that can be customized for the application the department wants, whether more rescue or more medical.”

1 Alexis Fire Equipment Company built this squad for the Lewistown (IL) Fire Protection District on a Ford F-550 chassis with a four-door cab. (Photo courtesy of Alexis Fire Equipment Company.)

1 Alexis Fire Equipment Company built this squad for the Lewistown (IL) Fire Protection District on a Ford F-550 chassis with a four-door cab. (Photo courtesy of Alexis Fire Equipment Company.)

Cost Factor

Jeff Morris, president of Alexis Fire Equipment Company, points out that economics can be a driving factor when a department chooses a small-chassis vehicle. “The economy is still having an effect on budgets,” Morris observes, “and with the cost of running big rigs out on every call, many departments are looking toward smaller vehicles, which cost less and are easier to maneuver. Departments are comparing $185,000 to $210,000 for a smaller chassis vehicle to a Type 1 custom pumper that costs between $450,000 and $600,000.”

Todd Nix, apparatus consultant for Unruh Fire, echoes the issue of budget restraints having an effect on cities and fire departments. “Many of them are making changes to enhance their response while trimming their budget and lowering operating costs,” Nix says. “That’s where the smaller apparatus come in, which is basically our bread and butter. And, staffing is definitely a part of the trend where across the country volunteer fire departments are seeing fewer firefighters show up. They don’t want one or two firefighters on a full-size pumper to an EMS call when they can jump into a smaller vehicle and do it safely.”

Small Vehicles and Staffing

Brian Connely, account manager for Spartan ER, points out that many departments are trying to squeeze all the equipment from a traditional pumper into a smaller unit. “They want a rig that can be used for an EMS squad, at a motor vehicle accident (MVA) rescue, and for wildland fires,” Connely says. “The cost of ownership is one of the reasons, both for the initial cost and the cost of operation, as well as because of staffing issues. We’ve seen this happen all over the country, very often in rural volunteer departments, but also with some career departments too.”

Mark Brenneman, engineer for 4 Guys Fire Trucks, concurs that the ex

Read more
Posted: Dec 20, 2017

Make Cancer Prevention a Priority in 2018

Editor’s Opinion chris Mc Loone
 

As I get older, the years seem to go by quicker and quicker, and it is always amazing to me that a year has gone by and how much has occurred.

As I look back at 2017, I see what I feel was a more concerted push than ever to increase mental health and cancer awareness among firefighters. Both issues plague the fire service and are getting the attention they deserve. Cancer, in particular, has received coverage in fire service publications and Web sites, is a major topic at conferences around the country, and has also received mainstream media coverage as fire departments begin to address the issue as well as take steps to increase prevention awareness.

It seems like cancer is prevalent everywhere these days. It catches people whom you’d never think it would catch and then leaves three-pack-a-day smokers alone. It really baffles me sometimes about the randomness of it, yet we do know now that firefighters are prone to developing certain types of cancers over time.

What I am most concerned about right now is looking at firefighters today making mistakes that can harm them down the line when they are looking to enjoy retirement. Because that’s when many, many firefighters are finding out they have cancer—after their retirement parties when they are looking to get working on their hobbies, their vacation spots, their second careers, and enjoying their grandkids.

Can we point to any one specific carcinogen that is taking firefighters out? I haven’t seen anything that says, “Watch out for this carcinogen in particular.” The fact is that we don’t know what’s burning most of the time until the fire is out and we can see what was burning. And if we’ve taken off our self-contained breathing apparatus and we’re wandering around smoldering contents that are all off gassing and still smoking, then frankly it’s too late. And if we go outside, doff our personal protective equipment (PPE), take a breather, get some water, and then put it all back on again to go back inside, then we’re simply reintroducing everything back into our systems once again.

So, what do we do? Gordon Graham says it best when he says, “If it’s predictable, it’s preventable.”

During 2018, start with your station. Look around through a cancer prevention lens. Is your PPE out on the apparatus floor? If so, is there anything you can do to get it out of harm’s way? Do you have a room that can be converted? Have you looked into the systems available to filter and remove harmful diesel exhaust contaminants? Not everyone can do any of this. Captain Beth Gallup, Kent (WA) Fire Department Regional Fire Authority, says that doing something at all is better than nothing at all. If there’s nothing you can do at your firehouse, what can you do on the fireground?

If you haven’t heard about it this year, you’re going to be hearing a lot about gross decontamination of PPE on exiting a fire. Gross decon is really only one part of it though. What are we going to do with that PPE once we doff it? Some are calling for that initial attack to be the only time we spend inside at a working structure fire. Some espouse exiting the fire building; going through gross decon, whatever your fire department’s decon process is; doffing your

Read more
Posted: Dec 20, 2017

Make Cancer Prevention a Priority in 2018

Editor’s Opinion chris Mc Loone
 

As I get older, the years seem to go by quicker and quicker, and it is always amazing to me that a year has gone by and how much has occurred.

As I look back at 2017, I see what I feel was a more concerted push than ever to increase mental health and cancer awareness among firefighters. Both issues plague the fire service and are getting the attention they deserve. Cancer, in particular, has received coverage in fire service publications and Web sites, is a major topic at conferences around the country, and has also received mainstream media coverage as fire departments begin to address the issue as well as take steps to increase prevention awareness.

It seems like cancer is prevalent everywhere these days. It catches people whom you’d never think it would catch and then leaves three-pack-a-day smokers alone. It really baffles me sometimes about the randomness of it, yet we do know now that firefighters are prone to developing certain types of cancers over time.

What I am most concerned about right now is looking at firefighters today making mistakes that can harm them down the line when they are looking to enjoy retirement. Because that’s when many, many firefighters are finding out they have cancer—after their retirement parties when they are looking to get working on their hobbies, their vacation spots, their second careers, and enjoying their grandkids.

Can we point to any one specific carcinogen that is taking firefighters out? I haven’t seen anything that says, “Watch out for this carcinogen in particular.” The fact is that we don’t know what’s burning most of the time until the fire is out and we can see what was burning. And if we’ve taken off our self-contained breathing apparatus and we’re wandering around smoldering contents that are all off gassing and still smoking, then frankly it’s too late. And if we go outside, doff our personal protective equipment (PPE), take a breather, get some water, and then put it all back on again to go back inside, then we’re simply reintroducing everything back into our systems once again.

So, what do we do? Gordon Graham says it best when he says, “If it’s predictable, it’s preventable.”

During 2018, start with your station. Look around through a cancer prevention lens. Is your PPE out on the apparatus floor? If so, is there anything you can do to get it out of harm’s way? Do you have a room that can be converted? Have you looked into the systems available to filter and remove harmful diesel exhaust contaminants? Not everyone can do any of this. Captain Beth Gallup, Kent (WA) Fire Department Regional Fire Authority, says that doing something at all is better than nothing at all. If there’s nothing you can do at your firehouse, what can you do on the fireground?

If you haven’t heard about it this year, you’re going to be hearing a lot about gross decontamination of PPE on exiting a fire. Gross decon is really only one part of it though. What are we going to do with that PPE once we doff it? Some are calling for that initial attack to be the only time we spend inside at a working structure fire. Some espouse exiting the fire building; going through gross decon, whatever your fire department’s decon process is; doffing your

Read more
RSS
First51435144514551465148515051515152Last

Theme picker

Search News Articles