Menu

WFC News

Posted: Feb 1, 2019

Technical Rescue Staffing and Training

Richard Marinucci

Motivating fire service personnel to participate as active members of a technical rescue team can be very challenging. This includes all ranks. Further, fire chiefs and other administrators must also maintain support for events that are often very infrequent.

Richard Marinucci

This is especially true when participation as a team member is voluntary and team leaders must pay attention to recruitment and retention. For firefighters to accept extra assignments, the work must be attractive and appropriately rewarded—and not just financially. What gets supported and rewarded gets done.

Think about what might happen if someone got to practice a sport every day but never got to play in a game. There would be no way to feed the competitive juices and most, if not all, participants would forgo the practices and look for a different pastime. As an example, I was recently talking to a high school football coach. We were discussing the decline of participants in the sport, and we talked about some of the reasons. There is more concern for concussions, competition from more sports, year-round requirements, and others. One thing the coach mentioned was the challenge to get players to practice every day when there was only one game per week. There is also a lead-up time where there are weeks of practice before the first game is even played. He opined that kids playing sports want to play the games, not just practice, and in other sports there are more opportunities to compete. This certainly is something to think about, whether a sport or being part of a special rescue unit that rarely gets to “compete.”

CHIEF SUPPORT

For specialty teams to be successful, there must be enthusiastic support from the top of the organization, including the chief of department and senior staff. They cannot pay lip service to this and must communicate to the entire department that positions on the team are valued and will be supported. I have known chiefs who are the opposite, and their member participation leaves much to be desired. Those who truly value team membership do better with recruitment and retention. They show their support overtly and do not quibble when training arises. They don’t deny training opportunities by hiding behind staffing issues. There is a difference for those with legitimate issues and those who are not supportive.

There are some chiefs who personally don’t support the efforts of special rescue teams and membership. They may tolerate them if they have no choice but may also question whether the expense is worth the payback if their community has no history of needing such service. This is shortsighted in that not too many communities routinely need special teams. But when the call arises, having properly trained firefighters will be worth the effort. This can be challenging in communities strapped for resources, but I am aware of cases where this was not the issue, but the chief opted out anyway. This is not an approach to take if you are looking for people to volunteer.

GETTING THE RIGHT PEOPLE

As is the case with any job, you have to start with talent and those who are interested in the work. This begins

Read more
Posted: Feb 1, 2019

Technical Rescue Staffing and Training

Richard Marinucci

Motivating fire service personnel to participate as active members of a technical rescue team can be very challenging. This includes all ranks. Further, fire chiefs and other administrators must also maintain support for events that are often very infrequent.

Richard Marinucci

This is especially true when participation as a team member is voluntary and team leaders must pay attention to recruitment and retention. For firefighters to accept extra assignments, the work must be attractive and appropriately rewarded—and not just financially. What gets supported and rewarded gets done.

Think about what might happen if someone got to practice a sport every day but never got to play in a game. There would be no way to feed the competitive juices and most, if not all, participants would forgo the practices and look for a different pastime. As an example, I was recently talking to a high school football coach. We were discussing the decline of participants in the sport, and we talked about some of the reasons. There is more concern for concussions, competition from more sports, year-round requirements, and others. One thing the coach mentioned was the challenge to get players to practice every day when there was only one game per week. There is also a lead-up time where there are weeks of practice before the first game is even played. He opined that kids playing sports want to play the games, not just practice, and in other sports there are more opportunities to compete. This certainly is something to think about, whether a sport or being part of a special rescue unit that rarely gets to “compete.”

CHIEF SUPPORT

For specialty teams to be successful, there must be enthusiastic support from the top of the organization, including the chief of department and senior staff. They cannot pay lip service to this and must communicate to the entire department that positions on the team are valued and will be supported. I have known chiefs who are the opposite, and their member participation leaves much to be desired. Those who truly value team membership do better with recruitment and retention. They show their support overtly and do not quibble when training arises. They don’t deny training opportunities by hiding behind staffing issues. There is a difference for those with legitimate issues and those who are not supportive.

There are some chiefs who personally don’t support the efforts of special rescue teams and membership. They may tolerate them if they have no choice but may also question whether the expense is worth the payback if their community has no history of needing such service. This is shortsighted in that not too many communities routinely need special teams. But when the call arises, having properly trained firefighters will be worth the effort. This can be challenging in communities strapped for resources, but I am aware of cases where this was not the issue, but the chief opted out anyway. This is not an approach to take if you are looking for people to volunteer.

GETTING THE RIGHT PEOPLE

As is the case with any job, you have to start with talent and those who are interested in the work. This begins

Read more
Posted: Feb 1, 2019

Wildland Fire Apparatus: What Makes Them NFPA-Compliant?


A conundrum can be defined as a dispute, a problem, or even a confrontation. In the fire service, deciding to comply or not to comply with a National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) standard or any part thereof is a conundrum. It can create confusion and consternation in the ranks. Equally challenging is determining which standard to follow if more than one could be applicable.

I believe an NFPA standard is a nationwide consensus criterion specifying minimum requirements where voluntary compliance is influenced by the possibility of litigation. There are scenarios where legislation by political subdivisions as well as contractual agreements between two parties legally mandate NFPA compliance. Even in those so-called binding circumstances, fire departments have been known to fully embrace NFPA standards to secure equipment with features they desire and, in turn, systematically ignore standards with features they dislike. Prime examples of the latter are specifying noncompliant retroreflective chevron colors on the rear of apparatus and not securing fire helmets when carried in apparatus cabs. It is hypocritical but commonplace. Apparatus manufacturers tend to follow NFPA standards—especially those manufacturers recalling the demise of the Peter Pirsch Company in 1985 caused, in part, by a wrongful death lawsuit.

On the roster in Hamlin, New York, is this 1973 Jeep CJ-5 grass fire truck equipped with a 200-gallon-per-minute (gpm) pump, 120-gallon tank, reel, grass fire brooms, extinguishers, and Class A foam. (Photos 1 and 2 courtesy of Allan Smith.)
On the roster in Hamlin, New York, is this 1973 Jeep CJ-5 grass fire truck equipped with a 200-gallon-per-minute (gpm) pump, 120-gallon tank, reel, grass fire brooms, extinguishers, and Class A foam. (Photos 1 and 2 courtesy of Allan Smith.)

1 2 On the roster in Hamlin, New York, is this 1973 Jeep CJ-5 grass fire truck equipped with a 200-gallon-per-minute (gpm) pump, 120-gallon tank, reel, grass fire brooms, extinguishers, and Class A foam. (Photos 1 and 2 courtesy of Allan Smith.)

Purchasing or placing into service a grass fire truck is when two NFPA standards could apply to the same rig. In particular, they are NFPA 1901, Standard for Automotive Fire Apparatus, and NFPA 1906, Standard for Wildland Apparatus. When NFPA 1906 apparatus are referenced herein, Chapter 5 (wildland fire suppression apparatus) applies. When NFPA 1901 apparatus are referenced, Chapter 5 (pumpers) and Chapter 6 (initial attack apparatus) apply.

It is immaterial if a grass fire truck is built by an apparatus manufacturer, a local fabrication shop, or the fire department itself. The conundrum is determining if it has to be manufactured, equipped, and operated in compliance with either or part of the aforementioned NFPA standards. Q

Read more
Posted: Feb 1, 2019

Wildland Fire Apparatus: What Makes Them NFPA-Compliant?


A conundrum can be defined as a dispute, a problem, or even a confrontation. In the fire service, deciding to comply or not to comply with a National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) standard or any part thereof is a conundrum. It can create confusion and consternation in the ranks. Equally challenging is determining which standard to follow if more than one could be applicable.

I believe an NFPA standard is a nationwide consensus criterion specifying minimum requirements where voluntary compliance is influenced by the possibility of litigation. There are scenarios where legislation by political subdivisions as well as contractual agreements between two parties legally mandate NFPA compliance. Even in those so-called binding circumstances, fire departments have been known to fully embrace NFPA standards to secure equipment with features they desire and, in turn, systematically ignore standards with features they dislike. Prime examples of the latter are specifying noncompliant retroreflective chevron colors on the rear of apparatus and not securing fire helmets when carried in apparatus cabs. It is hypocritical but commonplace. Apparatus manufacturers tend to follow NFPA standards—especially those manufacturers recalling the demise of the Peter Pirsch Company in 1985 caused, in part, by a wrongful death lawsuit.

On the roster in Hamlin, New York, is this 1973 Jeep CJ-5 grass fire truck equipped with a 200-gallon-per-minute (gpm) pump, 120-gallon tank, reel, grass fire brooms, extinguishers, and Class A foam. (Photos 1 and 2 courtesy of Allan Smith.)
On the roster in Hamlin, New York, is this 1973 Jeep CJ-5 grass fire truck equipped with a 200-gallon-per-minute (gpm) pump, 120-gallon tank, reel, grass fire brooms, extinguishers, and Class A foam. (Photos 1 and 2 courtesy of Allan Smith.)

1 2 On the roster in Hamlin, New York, is this 1973 Jeep CJ-5 grass fire truck equipped with a 200-gallon-per-minute (gpm) pump, 120-gallon tank, reel, grass fire brooms, extinguishers, and Class A foam. (Photos 1 and 2 courtesy of Allan Smith.)

Purchasing or placing into service a grass fire truck is when two NFPA standards could apply to the same rig. In particular, they are NFPA 1901, Standard for Automotive Fire Apparatus, and NFPA 1906, Standard for Wildland Apparatus. When NFPA 1906 apparatus are referenced herein, Chapter 5 (wildland fire suppression apparatus) applies. When NFPA 1901 apparatus are referenced, Chapter 5 (pumpers) and Chapter 6 (initial attack apparatus) apply.

It is immaterial if a grass fire truck is built by an apparatus manufacturer, a local fabrication shop, or the fire department itself. The conundrum is determining if it has to be manufactured, equipped, and operated in compliance with either or part of the aforementioned NFPA standards. Q

Read more
Posted: Feb 1, 2019

Video: Enfield (NS) Volunteer Fire Department E-ONE Cyclone® 100-Foot Platform


With 35 volunteers and two career members, the Enfield Volunteer Fire Department in Nova Scotia covers about 350 calls a year and serves a population of about 6,500. Located just outside the capital city of Halifax, the department responds to extreme weather situations both hot and very cold. Learn more in this video.

Some truck specs:

  • • 78,000 lbs. GVWR
  • 250″ wheelbase w/formed integral torque box frame
  • 11′-10″ +/-1″ travel height
  • 46′-10″ +/-1″ overall length
  • E-ONE Cyclone® 58” extruded aluminum cab, Bostrom® seating for (6) with Ready Reach extenders and IMMI® SmartDock Gen2 SCBA brackets
  • Cummins® ISX12 500 HP engine with Jacobs® compression brake and Allison® EVS4000P transmission
  • Extruded aluminum body w/ SideStacker™ hose bed and slide-out rear access platform
  • Rescue style extended height compartments with R∙O•M™ Series IV roll-up doors, enclosed wheel well storage for (8) SCBA bottles and (4) wheel well storage compartments
  • Hale® Qmax 8000 LPM pump with FRC® PBA400 pressure governor
  • 100’ Platform with 2.5 to 1 structural safety factor
  • Welded extruded aluminum construction
  • Crisscross under-slung outriggers (15’-6” jack spread)

For more information on E-ONE aerials, visit www.e-one.com.

Read more
RSS
First15461547154815491551155315541555Last

Theme picker

Search News Articles