Menu

WFC News

Posted: Apr 1, 2018

Improving Fire Apparatus Ops with Data Analysis

Fire and emergency service departments are high-reliability organizations (HROs) in that there are inherent risks and vulnerabilities.

Our job as fire officers is to help keep our personnel safe by identifying those risks and taking measures to reduce vulnerabilities. An HRO is any organization where there is an emphasis on people, process, and priorities working and safety is a concern. Improvements are gained and risks minimized through factual and complete data being collected, whereas factors and sequencing may be flawed as well as measures of prevention without root cause analysis.1

Crash Data Tools

To help our emergency vehicle operators improve, we can collect and assess emergency vehicle crashes with a more detailed and personal approach using different tools. One, a crash data collection tool, was adapted from the Model Minimum Uniform Crash Criteria2 and can be filled out as soon as possible after an emergency vehicle crash as an incident report form. It addresses human, vehicle, and physical environmental features. Meanwhile, a crash data analysis tool, when applied, analyzes the human, vehicle, physical, and psychosocial environment prior to a crash, at the time of the crash, and post crash.

Consider the following: An apparatus engineer (AE) wakes at 0330 for an alarm call and reports with a crew to the apparatus and goes en route. The crew departs the fire station at 0331, and the AE pulls into the roadway and abruptly comes to a halt as a burning order is noted. Emergency lights are activated, but the fire engine is struck by an oncoming car.

To use a data collection tool, the officer would simply pull out the crash data collection tool and mark the appropriate boxes regarding the driver, vehicle, and physical environment. The tool is designed to collect descriptors of events that can be drawn from with interviews to portray the event. Then, through use of the crash data analysis tool and interviews, you may find out the following:

■ Prior to the event, the AE had not slept for nearly 40 hours.

■ The AE takes medications where heavy machinery should not be operated.

■ The vehicle had brake work performed fewer than 12 hours earlier.

■ The AE reported to the officer that the vehicle did not seem to be operating or braking as it usually did.

■ The maintenance division had not been notified of any difficulties by the officer.

■ The AE advised the officer at 1900 the previous evening that a “check engine” light appeared.

■ Immediately after the incident, the AE stepped away from the apparatus, throwing tools and equipment and cursing at the officer.

■ The roadway at the scene of the crash had been closed to allow one lane of traffic at 0200 on that date.

Using a crash data analysis tool with root cause questioning and continuing to ask “why” can help identify true primary causative factors such as:

■ Creating a policy addressing limited sleep or

Read more
Posted: Apr 1, 2018

Improving Fire Apparatus Ops with Data Analysis

Fire and emergency service departments are high-reliability organizations (HROs) in that there are inherent risks and vulnerabilities.

Our job as fire officers is to help keep our personnel safe by identifying those risks and taking measures to reduce vulnerabilities. An HRO is any organization where there is an emphasis on people, process, and priorities working and safety is a concern. Improvements are gained and risks minimized through factual and complete data being collected, whereas factors and sequencing may be flawed as well as measures of prevention without root cause analysis.1

Crash Data Tools

To help our emergency vehicle operators improve, we can collect and assess emergency vehicle crashes with a more detailed and personal approach using different tools. One, a crash data collection tool, was adapted from the Model Minimum Uniform Crash Criteria2 and can be filled out as soon as possible after an emergency vehicle crash as an incident report form. It addresses human, vehicle, and physical environmental features. Meanwhile, a crash data analysis tool, when applied, analyzes the human, vehicle, physical, and psychosocial environment prior to a crash, at the time of the crash, and post crash.

Consider the following: An apparatus engineer (AE) wakes at 0330 for an alarm call and reports with a crew to the apparatus and goes en route. The crew departs the fire station at 0331, and the AE pulls into the roadway and abruptly comes to a halt as a burning order is noted. Emergency lights are activated, but the fire engine is struck by an oncoming car.

To use a data collection tool, the officer would simply pull out the crash data collection tool and mark the appropriate boxes regarding the driver, vehicle, and physical environment. The tool is designed to collect descriptors of events that can be drawn from with interviews to portray the event. Then, through use of the crash data analysis tool and interviews, you may find out the following:

■ Prior to the event, the AE had not slept for nearly 40 hours.

■ The AE takes medications where heavy machinery should not be operated.

■ The vehicle had brake work performed fewer than 12 hours earlier.

■ The AE reported to the officer that the vehicle did not seem to be operating or braking as it usually did.

■ The maintenance division had not been notified of any difficulties by the officer.

■ The AE advised the officer at 1900 the previous evening that a “check engine” light appeared.

■ Immediately after the incident, the AE stepped away from the apparatus, throwing tools and equipment and cursing at the officer.

■ The roadway at the scene of the crash had been closed to allow one lane of traffic at 0200 on that date.

Using a crash data analysis tool with root cause questioning and continuing to ask “why” can help identify true primary causative factors such as:

■ Creating a policy addressing limited sleep or

Read more
Posted: Apr 1, 2018

Trends in Small- and Medium-Sized Fire and Rescue Boats

Many fire departments around the country have a need for small- or medium-sized fire boats, rescue boats, or a combination of the two to deal with emergencies on rivers, bays, lakes, or other bodies of water in their protection districts.

1 Metal Shark Aluminum Boats built this 32-foot Defiant model fire/rescue boat for the Iona McGregor (FL) Fire Department. (Photos 1 and 2 courtesy of Metal Shark Aluminum Boats.)

1 Metal Shark Aluminum Boats built this 32-foot Defiant model fire/rescue boat for the Iona McGregor (FL) Fire Department. (Photos 1 and 2 courtesy of Metal Shark Aluminum Boats.)

And, the types of boats and the equipment being used on those vessels vary widely, depending on the boat’s size, type, and mission.

2 Miami Beach (FL) Fire Rescue went to Metal Shark Aluminum Boats for this 28-foot Courageous model fire/rescue boat.

2 Miami Beach (FL) Fire Rescue went to Metal Shark Aluminum Boats for this 28-foot Courageous model fire/rescue boat.

RegionAL NEEDS

Dean Jones, director of sales for Metal Shark Aluminum Boats, says the type of vessel chosen by a fire department can be somewhat regional, with those in the Northeast, Southeast, and Southern California areas typically looking for boats in the 29- to 60-foot range, while other areas of the country usually are seeking boats in the 24- to 30-foot range. “With boats used on inland waterways, we’ve seen an uptick to 28- to 35-foot monohulls this year, up from 21- to 30-footers, and usually a combination of fire and rescue craft,” Jones points out.

3 The Waconia (MN) Fire Department had Lake Assault Boats build this bow-door-style fire/rescue boat. (Photos 3 and 4 courtesy of Lake Assault Boats.)

3 The Waconia (MN) Fire Department had Lake Assault Boats build this bow-door-style fire/rescue boat. (Photos 3 and 4 courtesy of Lake Assault Boats.)

He says that Metal Shark’s 28-foot Courageous, 29-foot Defiant, and 32-foot Defiant models have proven very popular with fire departments and usually are set up with dive door or rescue door cutouts in either one or both gunwales. “On the inboard engine versions of our boats, we also can put a dive platform off the stern and have built some boats that are bow-door models.”

<
Read more
Posted: Apr 1, 2018

Trends in Small- and Medium-Sized Fire and Rescue Boats

Many fire departments around the country have a need for small- or medium-sized fire boats, rescue boats, or a combination of the two to deal with emergencies on rivers, bays, lakes, or other bodies of water in their protection districts.

1 Metal Shark Aluminum Boats built this 32-foot Defiant model fire/rescue boat for the Iona McGregor (FL) Fire Department. (Photos 1 and 2 courtesy of Metal Shark Aluminum Boats.)

1 Metal Shark Aluminum Boats built this 32-foot Defiant model fire/rescue boat for the Iona McGregor (FL) Fire Department. (Photos 1 and 2 courtesy of Metal Shark Aluminum Boats.)

And, the types of boats and the equipment being used on those vessels vary widely, depending on the boat’s size, type, and mission.

2 Miami Beach (FL) Fire Rescue went to Metal Shark Aluminum Boats for this 28-foot Courageous model fire/rescue boat.

2 Miami Beach (FL) Fire Rescue went to Metal Shark Aluminum Boats for this 28-foot Courageous model fire/rescue boat.

RegionAL NEEDS

Dean Jones, director of sales for Metal Shark Aluminum Boats, says the type of vessel chosen by a fire department can be somewhat regional, with those in the Northeast, Southeast, and Southern California areas typically looking for boats in the 29- to 60-foot range, while other areas of the country usually are seeking boats in the 24- to 30-foot range. “With boats used on inland waterways, we’ve seen an uptick to 28- to 35-foot monohulls this year, up from 21- to 30-footers, and usually a combination of fire and rescue craft,” Jones points out.

3 The Waconia (MN) Fire Department had Lake Assault Boats build this bow-door-style fire/rescue boat. (Photos 3 and 4 courtesy of Lake Assault Boats.)

3 The Waconia (MN) Fire Department had Lake Assault Boats build this bow-door-style fire/rescue boat. (Photos 3 and 4 courtesy of Lake Assault Boats.)

He says that Metal Shark’s 28-foot Courageous, 29-foot Defiant, and 32-foot Defiant models have proven very popular with fire departments and usually are set up with dive door or rescue door cutouts in either one or both gunwales. “On the inboard engine versions of our boats, we also can put a dive platform off the stern and have built some boats that are bow-door models.”

<
Read more
Posted: Apr 1, 2018

Evolving Truck Company Operations

chief concerns richard marinucci
Eichard Marinucci

Truck company operations involve most activities on the fireground that support applying water on the fire.

Truck companies do what they can to give engine companies the best opportunity to complete their mission of water application. This involves forcible entry, ventilation, and searching for victims. Included are ladder operations to get firefighters to positions where they can do their job and also to provide a means of escape should traditional ways out be blocked. We may have not included everything here but suffice to say, the truck companies are “jacks of all trades” and vital components of any successful operation.

Modern research should cause fire departments to reevaluate truck company functions and perform those that will assist in mitigating the issues while allowing for reasonable personnel safety. As an example, ventilation on the fireground is an important function. For the most part, this has involved vertical ventilation, which means getting to the roof to open it up. It could also include horizontal options like breaking windows (my personal favorite). There can also be some mechanical options involving fans and such. But in today’s world with the information at hand, there must be more consideration of flow path and how ventilation will affect fire spread. In addition, modern construction techniques make roofs very untenable in a short period of time when supporting substructures are under fire conditions.

Current Research Impact

My time in the fire service has seen many changes resulting from research, with more occurring in the past couple of years than ever before. I have been part of many approaches to ventilation. There have been roof functions that mandated opening a roof on virtually all structure fires, airing of the structure by breaking every window that you could (my personal favorite), and using a positive-pressure fan. There was and is a time and a place for all. But, recent research on flow paths indicates that there needs to be much more thought into the best way to ventilate a structure, and that method must be coordinated with hose placement.

It seems that the arbitrary introduction of air into a structure fire will make things worse. So, the objective would be to greatly coordinate water application with ventilation. This means that forcible entry will wait for the engine crew to get to the access point. Of course, life safety and rescue opportunities will trump this. Roof operations for ventilation, horizontal considerations, and positive-pressure tactics must be done within the right time frame. There can be some standard options, but coordinating operations is essential.

Flow path is the most critical element in fire spread. Intuitively, we know that adding air to a fire will accelerate its growth. It works on simple things like campfires. We blow on them, fan them, or use bellows to get the fire development we desire. Uncontrolled air entrainment will make the fire less predictable and potentially more dangerous to occupants and firefighters. Some departments have changed their approach and are finding success. Simple things like assigning a door person to control air flow will allow for more tactics coordination. Any choices should not be arbitrary and should be based on sound knowledge o

Read more
RSS
First48454846484748484850485248534854Last

Theme picker

Search News Articles