Menu

WFC News

Posted: Apr 1, 2018

Evolving Truck Company Operations

chief concerns richard marinucci
Eichard Marinucci

Truck company operations involve most activities on the fireground that support applying water on the fire.

Truck companies do what they can to give engine companies the best opportunity to complete their mission of water application. This involves forcible entry, ventilation, and searching for victims. Included are ladder operations to get firefighters to positions where they can do their job and also to provide a means of escape should traditional ways out be blocked. We may have not included everything here but suffice to say, the truck companies are “jacks of all trades” and vital components of any successful operation.

Modern research should cause fire departments to reevaluate truck company functions and perform those that will assist in mitigating the issues while allowing for reasonable personnel safety. As an example, ventilation on the fireground is an important function. For the most part, this has involved vertical ventilation, which means getting to the roof to open it up. It could also include horizontal options like breaking windows (my personal favorite). There can also be some mechanical options involving fans and such. But in today’s world with the information at hand, there must be more consideration of flow path and how ventilation will affect fire spread. In addition, modern construction techniques make roofs very untenable in a short period of time when supporting substructures are under fire conditions.

Current Research Impact

My time in the fire service has seen many changes resulting from research, with more occurring in the past couple of years than ever before. I have been part of many approaches to ventilation. There have been roof functions that mandated opening a roof on virtually all structure fires, airing of the structure by breaking every window that you could (my personal favorite), and using a positive-pressure fan. There was and is a time and a place for all. But, recent research on flow paths indicates that there needs to be much more thought into the best way to ventilate a structure, and that method must be coordinated with hose placement.

It seems that the arbitrary introduction of air into a structure fire will make things worse. So, the objective would be to greatly coordinate water application with ventilation. This means that forcible entry will wait for the engine crew to get to the access point. Of course, life safety and rescue opportunities will trump this. Roof operations for ventilation, horizontal considerations, and positive-pressure tactics must be done within the right time frame. There can be some standard options, but coordinating operations is essential.

Flow path is the most critical element in fire spread. Intuitively, we know that adding air to a fire will accelerate its growth. It works on simple things like campfires. We blow on them, fan them, or use bellows to get the fire development we desire. Uncontrolled air entrainment will make the fire less predictable and potentially more dangerous to occupants and firefighters. Some departments have changed their approach and are finding success. Simple things like assigning a door person to control air flow will allow for more tactics coordination. Any choices should not be arbitrary and should be based on sound knowledge o

Read more
Posted: Apr 1, 2018

Is a Quint Fire Apparatus Crew an Engine or Ladder Company

On a busy summer afternoon, you’re dispatched to a single-family residential fire with multiple calls reporting fire coming out of the garage door.

In most cases, this is a “bread-and-butter” fire. Today is different, though. Today you’re the officer of the first-due “ladder”—a 105-foot straight stick quint with a 1,500 gallon-per-minute (gpm) fire pump and 300 gallons of tank water. During the response, you realize the closest engine is delayed because it is on a medical call.

Arriving on scene, you see a two-story single-family structure with an attached garage on the D side. The garage is well involved and threatening to extend into the house. As the first arriving fire officer, you must quickly evaluate your tactics—are you a ladder or are you an engine? Do you perform ladder work, or do you pull a handline and attack the fire? As many departments have decided to equip their ladder trucks with pumps and water, many officers are now faced with the tough decision of whether or not to pull a handline if that ladder arrives first. The decision is not clear-cut and requires careful consideration of the quickly evolving situation.

As progressive officers and firefighters, we are conditioned to go right to work and to put out the fire. We know the best chance for victim survival and preservation of property is to extinguish the fire. The solution may not be that simple, though (photo 1).

1 Ladder 10 arrived first on the scene of a residential fire while Engine 10 was tied up on a medical call. They elected to pull handlines because of time and distance of the next-in engine. (Photos by Rayford Smith.)

1 Ladder 10 arrived first on the scene of a residential fire while Engine 10 was tied up on a medical call. They elected to pull handlines because of time and distance of the next-in engine. (Photos by Rayford Smith.)

In National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) 1901, Standard for Automotive Fire Apparatus, the design of a quint essentially allows us to package an aerial device and an engine into one apparatus. The combination of an aerial ladder, ground ladders, hose, and water can be a major advantage to departments facing limited staffing and budget. The debate here, though, is not about the effectiveness of quints in a fleet or the total quint concept; rather, it revolves around the decisions faced when arriving first on scene as a ladder that has a pump and water. In the context of this question, references to “ladders” in this article assume they have a pump and a small supply of water onboard. While pulling a handline and putting water on the fire might seem like the first choice, let’s consider the alternatives. There are many reasons a ladder arriving first on scene should look to avoid pulling handlines if engines are responding. We will review when and where a ladder should and shouldn’t pull attack handlines.

Ladders Play an Important Role

In most departments, there are clear and direct procedures and operations for ladders (not considering the fire pump and the tank) when they arrive at a fire. They usually include forcible entry, search and rescue, ground ladders, ventilation,

Read more
Posted: Apr 1, 2018

Is a Quint Fire Apparatus Crew an Engine or Ladder Company

On a busy summer afternoon, you’re dispatched to a single-family residential fire with multiple calls reporting fire coming out of the garage door.

In most cases, this is a “bread-and-butter” fire. Today is different, though. Today you’re the officer of the first-due “ladder”—a 105-foot straight stick quint with a 1,500 gallon-per-minute (gpm) fire pump and 300 gallons of tank water. During the response, you realize the closest engine is delayed because it is on a medical call.

Arriving on scene, you see a two-story single-family structure with an attached garage on the D side. The garage is well involved and threatening to extend into the house. As the first arriving fire officer, you must quickly evaluate your tactics—are you a ladder or are you an engine? Do you perform ladder work, or do you pull a handline and attack the fire? As many departments have decided to equip their ladder trucks with pumps and water, many officers are now faced with the tough decision of whether or not to pull a handline if that ladder arrives first. The decision is not clear-cut and requires careful consideration of the quickly evolving situation.

As progressive officers and firefighters, we are conditioned to go right to work and to put out the fire. We know the best chance for victim survival and preservation of property is to extinguish the fire. The solution may not be that simple, though (photo 1).

1 Ladder 10 arrived first on the scene of a residential fire while Engine 10 was tied up on a medical call. They elected to pull handlines because of time and distance of the next-in engine. (Photos by Rayford Smith.)

1 Ladder 10 arrived first on the scene of a residential fire while Engine 10 was tied up on a medical call. They elected to pull handlines because of time and distance of the next-in engine. (Photos by Rayford Smith.)

In National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) 1901, Standard for Automotive Fire Apparatus, the design of a quint essentially allows us to package an aerial device and an engine into one apparatus. The combination of an aerial ladder, ground ladders, hose, and water can be a major advantage to departments facing limited staffing and budget. The debate here, though, is not about the effectiveness of quints in a fleet or the total quint concept; rather, it revolves around the decisions faced when arriving first on scene as a ladder that has a pump and water. In the context of this question, references to “ladders” in this article assume they have a pump and a small supply of water onboard. While pulling a handline and putting water on the fire might seem like the first choice, let’s consider the alternatives. There are many reasons a ladder arriving first on scene should look to avoid pulling handlines if engines are responding. We will review when and where a ladder should and shouldn’t pull attack handlines.

Ladders Play an Important Role

In most departments, there are clear and direct procedures and operations for ladders (not considering the fire pump and the tank) when they arrive at a fire. They usually include forcible entry, search and rescue, ground ladders, ventilation,

Read more
Posted: Apr 1, 2018

Hydraulic Extrication Tools and New Vehicle Technology: Where Do We Stand?

to the rescue carl j. haddon

Six or seven years ago, I stood in front of a classroom full of students at FDIC International and spoke about the future of automobiles and how it would affect vehicle rescue practices.

This included such things as vehicles whose computer systems took control of the car in the event of an imminent accident, cars that parked themselves, and autonomous or driverless vehicles. My attendees looked at me like I had three heads and chuckled. So, how do you like me now?

This all started for me in 2007 when a colleague made a statement about how the new Volvo XC90 was made of materials that were so tough none of the rescue tools from that time could conquer it. Although he was correct to an extent, another firefighter and I set out on a mission to prove my colleague wrong, which we did. That was 10 years ago. The 2017 model year version of that same vehicle now contains five times the amount of ultra-high-strength steel as the 2007 release did!

Up to the Task

If you were to ask me if today’s hydraulic rescue tools are five times better or stronger than the new ones we were using in 2007, I’d have to answer no. That said, many manufacturers have made improvements in blade, arm, cutting and spreading force, and mechanical advantage designs. Others have simply added new color schemes, lights, and other nonessential wiz bang creature features. There certainly has been vast improvement in the battery-powered tool lines, as battery technology has improved from when the first manufacturers tried introducing battery-powered tools in the 1980s.

1 At a recent training event, two 2017 crash-tested Volvo XC90 hybrid vehicles. One of these test cars had sustained a frontal offset (corner) 40-mph test, while the other had been subjected to a 45-mph side-impact test. (Photos by author.)

1 At a recent training event, two 2017 crash-tested Volvo XC90 hybrid vehicles. One of these test cars had sustained a frontal offset (corner) 40-mph test, while the other had been subjected to a 45-mph side-impact test. (Photos by author.)

Can the new rescue tools conquer the strength and hardness of the metals used to make that 2007 Volvo XC90 that I refer to above? My personal experience tells me that some of them can and some of them can’t. I will tell you that in the late fall of last year, I taught the full lecture and hands-on version of my FDIC International New Vehicle Extrication class in Wisconsin with two brand new, crash-tested 2017 Volvo XC90 Hybrids—the retail value of these two cars was in excess of $160,000. One of these test cars had sustained a frontal offset (corner) 40-mph test, while the other had been subjected to a 45-mph side-impact test. I share this information simply to offer that these were two of the toughest vehicles on the market, and they had virtually every option available on them. They had also been severely punished during the crash testing, which gave our students real-life scenarios on monster-tough

Read more
Posted: Apr 1, 2018

Hydraulic Extrication Tools and New Vehicle Technology: Where Do We Stand?

to the rescue carl j. haddon

Six or seven years ago, I stood in front of a classroom full of students at FDIC International and spoke about the future of automobiles and how it would affect vehicle rescue practices.

This included such things as vehicles whose computer systems took control of the car in the event of an imminent accident, cars that parked themselves, and autonomous or driverless vehicles. My attendees looked at me like I had three heads and chuckled. So, how do you like me now?

This all started for me in 2007 when a colleague made a statement about how the new Volvo XC90 was made of materials that were so tough none of the rescue tools from that time could conquer it. Although he was correct to an extent, another firefighter and I set out on a mission to prove my colleague wrong, which we did. That was 10 years ago. The 2017 model year version of that same vehicle now contains five times the amount of ultra-high-strength steel as the 2007 release did!

Up to the Task

If you were to ask me if today’s hydraulic rescue tools are five times better or stronger than the new ones we were using in 2007, I’d have to answer no. That said, many manufacturers have made improvements in blade, arm, cutting and spreading force, and mechanical advantage designs. Others have simply added new color schemes, lights, and other nonessential wiz bang creature features. There certainly has been vast improvement in the battery-powered tool lines, as battery technology has improved from when the first manufacturers tried introducing battery-powered tools in the 1980s.

1 At a recent training event, two 2017 crash-tested Volvo XC90 hybrid vehicles. One of these test cars had sustained a frontal offset (corner) 40-mph test, while the other had been subjected to a 45-mph side-impact test. (Photos by author.)

1 At a recent training event, two 2017 crash-tested Volvo XC90 hybrid vehicles. One of these test cars had sustained a frontal offset (corner) 40-mph test, while the other had been subjected to a 45-mph side-impact test. (Photos by author.)

Can the new rescue tools conquer the strength and hardness of the metals used to make that 2007 Volvo XC90 that I refer to above? My personal experience tells me that some of them can and some of them can’t. I will tell you that in the late fall of last year, I taught the full lecture and hands-on version of my FDIC International New Vehicle Extrication class in Wisconsin with two brand new, crash-tested 2017 Volvo XC90 Hybrids—the retail value of these two cars was in excess of $160,000. One of these test cars had sustained a frontal offset (corner) 40-mph test, while the other had been subjected to a 45-mph side-impact test. I share this information simply to offer that these were two of the toughest vehicles on the market, and they had virtually every option available on them. They had also been severely punished during the crash testing, which gave our students real-life scenarios on monster-tough

Read more
RSS
First48464847484848494851485348544855Last

Theme picker

Search News Articles