The Callisburg (TX) Volunteer Fire Department’s brand new Heavy Brush 116 roared into action, making its maiden debut battling its first grass fire, the department said in a Facebook post May 10, 2025.

Callisburg volunteers responded to a controlled burn that got out of control. Brush 113 and Heavy Brush 116 responded with two firefighters each and quickly contained the 3 acres that were on fire. Wet ground conditions complicated the situation as the small brush truck got stuck in a soft spot. The mud was no match for HB116 which continued to fight the fire, then pull B113 out of the mud.

“This powerful truck, acquired through the Texas A&M Forest Service’s Department of Defense Firefighter Property Program, is a game-changer for our department, boosting our ability to protect our community from wildfires and emergencies,” the post said.

“We couldn’t have outfitted this beast without you—our incredible Callisburg community,” the post said. “Your generous donations and unwavering support made it possible to equip Heavy Brush 116 with the tools it needs to keep us safe. Your support truly fuels our mission.”

The post Callisburg (TX) VFD’s New Heavy Brush Truck Makes Debut Battling Grass Fire appeared first on Fire Apparatus: Fire trucks, fire engines, emergency vehicles, and firefighting equipment.

The Salina (KS) Fire Department placed Engine 1 into service Friday, May 9, 2025, making it the sixth of the seven new fire apparatus ordered back in February 2024, the department said in a Facebook post.

The new pumper is now responding out of Fire House 1 on Elm Street, serving the north side of Salina.

Over the next couple weeks crews will be training and getting familiar with the new engine, the post said. It carries 750 gallons of water, 30 gallons of firefighting foam, ground ladders, and various hoses and tools. It’s also equipped with a battery-powered hydraulic combi tool for vehicle extrication.

“We’re proud to keep improving our fleet to better serve the community. One more to go,” the department said in the post.

Specifications

Chassis	Enforcer™
Body	Pumper
Actual Overall Height	9′ 8″
Engine	Cummins L9
Horsepower	450 hp
Front Suspension	TAK-4® Independent Front Suspension
Rear Suspension	Spring
Electrical System	Command Zone™
Foam System	Husky™ 12
Pump	Waterous Midship
Pump GPM	1500 gpm
Tank	Foam Water
Tank Size	750 gallons

New fire station coming

The department is also getting a new fire station, ksal.com reported. Fire Station 4 will be around 20,000 square feet, which is about triple the size of the current station. The three small bays will be upgraded to five large bays for fire apparatus and ambulances. Initially the new station will be staffed by a crew of five, including a truck and ambulance crew.

Officials broke ground on Station 4 in March. It should take a little over a year to build, and be fully operational by mid-summer 2026, the report said.

The post Salina (KS) FD Adds Pierce Pumper; New Fire Station Coming appeared first on Fire Apparatus: Fire trucks, fire engines, emergency vehicles, and firefighting equipment.

Hema Sivanandam – Bay Area News Group
(TNS)

BRENTWOOD — The Brentwood Planning Commission on Tuesday denied an application to build a new downtown fire station, citing that the building’s architectural design did not resemble others in the area or reflect the city’s agricultural roots.

The commission unanimously rejected a design review application from the Contra Costa County Fire Protection District to construct a new 8,137-square-foot fire station next to Brentwood Veteran’s Memorial Hall on First Street.

Commissioner Jeremy Jones recused himself from the meeting, citing that his employer has a building near the proposed station.

Aaron McAlister, deputy fire chief for the Contra Costa County Fire Protection District, said the district was “obviously disappointed” with the commission’s decision and will appeal to the Brentwood City Council.

“The city code says that we have 10 days to appeal, so we will be filing our appeal within that period,” McAlister told this news organization.

He said nine firefighters had already been hired for the proposed downtown Fire Station 94 after they graduated from the firefighter’s academy.

“Now we’re in a situation where those firefighters won’t be going to Brentwood for a long period of time; they are going to serve in other communities until we get a fire station,” said McAlister.

During Tuesday’s meeting, commissioners cited several concerns in their decision to turn down the widely debated project, including that it did not meet requirements under the Brentwood Municipal Code.

Commissioners felt the building does not create a “well-composed urban design” and does not complement the existing buildings in the downtown area due to the project’s size and brick composition.

They also found the project fell short in meeting the adequate landscaping required under the Downtown Specific Plan.

Planning Commission Vice Chairperson Kristopher Brand said the project needed a conditional use permit, which he felt was “overlooked” as the building has a gym on the ground floor.

Brand pointed out that the fire department’s supplemental fuel tank and generator, which are the core aspects of the infrastructure, would extend the minimum width of the building.

“The generator lands against the wall that opens for the parking lot adjacent to it, so from my perspective, that means it’s outside of that range,” said Brand. “Which means we do have an infrastructure that is absolutely necessary for the function and legal operation of the station on the ground floor that extends beyond that. Therefore, we need some kind of conditional use permit as per the Downtown Specific Plan.”

Fellow Commissioner Anita Roberts said she “will not rubber stamp” the project without the answers she requested on its impact.

“It’s offensive to me, and as far as I’m concerned, until I get the answers that I was looking for, I cannot in good conscience speak on this,” said Roberts. “I could not tell the fire department how much water they should put in the tank. They cannot tell this planning commission what it is that we need to do.”

In March, the Brentwood Planning Commission postponed its decision on the project despite a five-hour deliberation as they instructed city staff to provide details on the impact it would have on traffic, noise, and air quality.

The proposed Fire Station 94 has continuously faced objections from local military veterans and residents, who claim the site has been “historically and legally

R. Christian Smith
Chicago Tribune
(TNS)

The Aurora City Council next week is set to consider a new $35 million fire department headquarters building that would also include a relocated Fire Station 4.

The new fire station and headquarters building would be located on the site of the current Aurora Police Department headquarters, which is located on Indian Trail, to create a combined Aurora Public Safety Campus.

Aurora Fire Department officials have said this move would improve the department’s operations in multiple ways, including lower fire and emergency medical response times, much-needed expanded office space for department administration and a new storm-hardened, high-tech Emergency Operations Center.

The Aurora City Council’s Building, Zoning and Economic Development Committee previously approved resolutions establishing a public safety campus subdivision and setting a plan for the site.

Now, two more resolutions related to the project are set to go before the City Council at its meeting on Tuesday.

One of these resolutions would approve the $29.5 million construction of the new Aurora Fire Department headquarters and another would roughly double the dollar amount of a contract with Cordogan Clark of Aurora for architectural, design, engineering and construction services to a total cost of around $2.2 million.

Aldermen have already discussed the two items at length. The proposed new Aurora Fire Department headquarters went before the City Council’s Committee of the Whole on Tuesday, and it previously spent weeks before the Infrastructure and Technology Committee before it was moved along the approval process.

The project is expected to cost the city a total of $34.9 million. Beyond what is included in the two resolutions set to go before the City Council next week, additional costs include the purchase of technology and furniture for the new headquarters as well as utility connections, builders risk insurance and contingencies, according to past reporting.

Cordogan Clark’s contract is proposed to be increased because the amount was negotiated as a percentage of the construction cost, which rose from an original estimation of around $15.5 million to its currently proposed amount, city staff previously said.

The estimated price to construct the project rose because of inflation but also because the project expanded in part because a space for the Aurora Emergency Management Agency was added to the proposed fire department headquarters building, officials have previously said.

According to Ald. Ted Mesiacos, 3rd Ward, the City Council was not consulted about this expansion of the project when it happened. Aldermen only learned about the jump in price when the project came before the Infrastructure and Technology Committee last month, he previously said.

He was the only vote against the two items at the April 21 Infrastructure and Technology Committee meeting. While other aldermen on the committee had a number of questions, they still voted to continue moving the project through the approval process.

Questions from aldermen continued at Tuesday