Menu

WFC News

Posted: Apr 3, 2018

Do Thermal Imagers Help or Hinder Firefighters?

Thermal imaging camera (TIC) use in the fire service is becoming more widespread and more commonplace than ever before.

With the overall reduction in cost and different manufacturers competing for a small market share, the fire service has seen tremendous improvements in thermal imaging in the past decade. Or has it?

1 Photo 1 courtesy of Insight Training LLC and Project Kill the Flashover.

1 Photo 1 courtesy of Insight Training LLC and Project Kill the Flashover.

In truth, thermal imaging was originally and is still considered military technology. If you don’t believe me, try traveling internationally with a high-resolution TIC without the proper credentials and see what happens when you reach customs. The International Traffic and Arms Regulation (ITAR) and Export Administration Regulations (EAR) are two laws that control and affect the manufacturing, sales, and distribution of technology1 and prevent individuals with improper motives from using infrared technology (IR) to harm others. These regulations are why the fire service has an abundance of 9-Hz-processor-speed TICs on the market today. Anything above 30 Hz has to comply with ITAR and EAR, which is problematic for manufacturers. So, it is easier and less expensive to produce a 9-Hz-processor TIC. But, most firefighters are unaware that a 9-Hz TIC is inefficient and problematic for use on the fireground, as it will trail or lag when the user scans with the TIC. As the military and industry continue to improve on their use of TICs, the fire service has received, in many cases, the technological leftovers and has been limited by such regulations. For example, there are many features that are currently being marketed as innovative and new technology for fire service use when they have been in use by the military and industry for more than a decade. However, the purpose of this writing is not to belittle or demean the manufacturers of TICs but to point out what we as the fire service are responsible for.

2 Photo 2 courtesy of Insight Training LLC and Project Kill the Flashover.

2 Photo 2 courtesy of Insight Training LLC and Project Kill the Flashover.

Purchased with No Training

The issue is this: Fire service TICs are being purchased by fire departments as common tools. But in many cases, they are being purchased without the necessary research, education, and training. In my research and travels, I have found the following to be a common thread internationally.

A lack of performance-based testing or needs assessment criteria: These criteria define the best TIC for an organization’s use, which is done through a needs assessment process. A fire department needs a specific criterion to make its final thermal imaging purchasing decision, which should include a testing program that allows it to see h

Read more
Posted: Apr 3, 2018

Do Thermal Imagers Help or Hinder Firefighters?

Thermal imaging camera (TIC) use in the fire service is becoming more widespread and more commonplace than ever before.

With the overall reduction in cost and different manufacturers competing for a small market share, the fire service has seen tremendous improvements in thermal imaging in the past decade. Or has it?

1 Photo 1 courtesy of Insight Training LLC and Project Kill the Flashover.

1 Photo 1 courtesy of Insight Training LLC and Project Kill the Flashover.

In truth, thermal imaging was originally and is still considered military technology. If you don’t believe me, try traveling internationally with a high-resolution TIC without the proper credentials and see what happens when you reach customs. The International Traffic and Arms Regulation (ITAR) and Export Administration Regulations (EAR) are two laws that control and affect the manufacturing, sales, and distribution of technology1 and prevent individuals with improper motives from using infrared technology (IR) to harm others. These regulations are why the fire service has an abundance of 9-Hz-processor-speed TICs on the market today. Anything above 30 Hz has to comply with ITAR and EAR, which is problematic for manufacturers. So, it is easier and less expensive to produce a 9-Hz-processor TIC. But, most firefighters are unaware that a 9-Hz TIC is inefficient and problematic for use on the fireground, as it will trail or lag when the user scans with the TIC. As the military and industry continue to improve on their use of TICs, the fire service has received, in many cases, the technological leftovers and has been limited by such regulations. For example, there are many features that are currently being marketed as innovative and new technology for fire service use when they have been in use by the military and industry for more than a decade. However, the purpose of this writing is not to belittle or demean the manufacturers of TICs but to point out what we as the fire service are responsible for.

2 Photo 2 courtesy of Insight Training LLC and Project Kill the Flashover.

2 Photo 2 courtesy of Insight Training LLC and Project Kill the Flashover.

Purchased with No Training

The issue is this: Fire service TICs are being purchased by fire departments as common tools. But in many cases, they are being purchased without the necessary research, education, and training. In my research and travels, I have found the following to be a common thread internationally.

A lack of performance-based testing or needs assessment criteria: These criteria define the best TIC for an organization’s use, which is done through a needs assessment process. A fire department needs a specific criterion to make its final thermal imaging purchasing decision, which should include a testing program that allows it to see h

Read more
Posted: Apr 3, 2018

Decontamination Solutions for on the Fireground

keeping it safe robert tutterow
Robert Tutterow

When the fire is out, what do you do with the contaminated equipment? This is another column that is an output of the Cancer Alliance Symposium held last September in Phoenix, Arizona.

One of the workshops centered around the topic of vehicles and exposures, and I was honored to be the presenter. However, I was confronted with a big problem—there is very little information available on the subject. In past columns, I have addressed the cab interiors with an emphasis on seats, flooring, and design, and I have also addressed removing self-contained breathing apparatus (SCBA) from the cab.

In this month’s column, I am presenting thoughts on how to handle contaminated equipment from a vehicle perspective. Paramount to this discussion is the goal of not having contaminated equipment on or in the apparatus. How is this accomplished? There is a variety of ways for departments to consider.

Decontamination Units

One concept is to think of dedicated decontamination units on a regional basis. A somewhat comparable concept is the way we refill SCBA cylinders. Does every fire station have a stationary or mobile cylinder refill station? Of course not. They are regionalized. What about hazmat decontamination units? Obviously, not every station or every department has a dedicated decontamination unit. However, most departments have access to a regional decontamination unit. A regional decontamination unit for contaminated equipment and personal protective equipment (PPE) is not a far-fetched thought. I know the idea is being seriously discussed in South Florida. To underscore this idea, it is important to consider a fire as a hazmat incident. Jeff Stull, International Fire Personnel Protection, is clearly one of the foremost experts on exposures, and he is of the thought that fires are more of a hazmat incident than most hazmat incidents as we consider them today. Regional decontamination units could range from large tractor-drawn rigs to “engine-size” rigs to trailers.

Following the presentation on vehicles and exposures, attendees participated in a survey to gather additional information. One of the questions was: “Do you think a mobile decontamination unit is feasible for larger departments, and, on a regional basis, for smaller departments?” Fifty-nine percent thought this was feasible, and 41 percent did not. Clearly, the idea has merit, though there are skeptics.

Another related question was: “If yes, what equipment should be included with that unit?” The answers included larger scale portable showers, soap, brushes, hand wash stations, change of clothing, water, refrigerators, bags for contaminated gear, spare SCBA, etc. A couple of respondents commented that existing hazmat decon units could be used.

Decontamination Kits

The above concept is primarily for structure fires involving more than one company or department. But, what about the smaller fires that require only one company or unit, such as a car fire or dumpster fire? A regional decontamination unit is probably not the solution. A more practical approach is that every engine company (and perhaps ladder companies and heavy rescues, depending on the department) should have a decont

Read more
Posted: Apr 3, 2018

Decontamination Solutions for on the Fireground

keeping it safe robert tutterow
Robert Tutterow

When the fire is out, what do you do with the contaminated equipment? This is another column that is an output of the Cancer Alliance Symposium held last September in Phoenix, Arizona.

One of the workshops centered around the topic of vehicles and exposures, and I was honored to be the presenter. However, I was confronted with a big problem—there is very little information available on the subject. In past columns, I have addressed the cab interiors with an emphasis on seats, flooring, and design, and I have also addressed removing self-contained breathing apparatus (SCBA) from the cab.

In this month’s column, I am presenting thoughts on how to handle contaminated equipment from a vehicle perspective. Paramount to this discussion is the goal of not having contaminated equipment on or in the apparatus. How is this accomplished? There is a variety of ways for departments to consider.

Decontamination Units

One concept is to think of dedicated decontamination units on a regional basis. A somewhat comparable concept is the way we refill SCBA cylinders. Does every fire station have a stationary or mobile cylinder refill station? Of course not. They are regionalized. What about hazmat decontamination units? Obviously, not every station or every department has a dedicated decontamination unit. However, most departments have access to a regional decontamination unit. A regional decontamination unit for contaminated equipment and personal protective equipment (PPE) is not a far-fetched thought. I know the idea is being seriously discussed in South Florida. To underscore this idea, it is important to consider a fire as a hazmat incident. Jeff Stull, International Fire Personnel Protection, is clearly one of the foremost experts on exposures, and he is of the thought that fires are more of a hazmat incident than most hazmat incidents as we consider them today. Regional decontamination units could range from large tractor-drawn rigs to “engine-size” rigs to trailers.

Following the presentation on vehicles and exposures, attendees participated in a survey to gather additional information. One of the questions was: “Do you think a mobile decontamination unit is feasible for larger departments, and, on a regional basis, for smaller departments?” Fifty-nine percent thought this was feasible, and 41 percent did not. Clearly, the idea has merit, though there are skeptics.

Another related question was: “If yes, what equipment should be included with that unit?” The answers included larger scale portable showers, soap, brushes, hand wash stations, change of clothing, water, refrigerators, bags for contaminated gear, spare SCBA, etc. A couple of respondents commented that existing hazmat decon units could be used.

Decontamination Kits

The above concept is primarily for structure fires involving more than one company or department. But, what about the smaller fires that require only one company or unit, such as a car fire or dumpster fire? A regional decontamination unit is probably not the solution. A more practical approach is that every engine company (and perhaps ladder companies and heavy rescues, depending on the department) should have a decont

Read more
Posted: Apr 3, 2018

Decontamination Solutions for on the Fireground

keeping it safe robert tutterow
Robert Tutterow

When the fire is out, what do you do with the contaminated equipment? This is another column that is an output of the Cancer Alliance Symposium held last September in Phoenix, Arizona.

One of the workshops centered around the topic of vehicles and exposures, and I was honored to be the presenter. However, I was confronted with a big problem—there is very little information available on the subject. In past columns, I have addressed the cab interiors with an emphasis on seats, flooring, and design, and I have also addressed removing self-contained breathing apparatus (SCBA) from the cab.

In this month’s column, I am presenting thoughts on how to handle contaminated equipment from a vehicle perspective. Paramount to this discussion is the goal of not having contaminated equipment on or in the apparatus. How is this accomplished? There is a variety of ways for departments to consider.

Decontamination Units

One concept is to think of dedicated decontamination units on a regional basis. A somewhat comparable concept is the way we refill SCBA cylinders. Does every fire station have a stationary or mobile cylinder refill station? Of course not. They are regionalized. What about hazmat decontamination units? Obviously, not every station or every department has a dedicated decontamination unit. However, most departments have access to a regional decontamination unit. A regional decontamination unit for contaminated equipment and personal protective equipment (PPE) is not a far-fetched thought. I know the idea is being seriously discussed in South Florida. To underscore this idea, it is important to consider a fire as a hazmat incident. Jeff Stull, International Fire Personnel Protection, is clearly one of the foremost experts on exposures, and he is of the thought that fires are more of a hazmat incident than most hazmat incidents as we consider them today. Regional decontamination units could range from large tractor-drawn rigs to “engine-size” rigs to trailers.

Following the presentation on vehicles and exposures, attendees participated in a survey to gather additional information. One of the questions was: “Do you think a mobile decontamination unit is feasible for larger departments, and, on a regional basis, for smaller departments?” Fifty-nine percent thought this was feasible, and 41 percent did not. Clearly, the idea has merit, though there are skeptics.

Another related question was: “If yes, what equipment should be included with that unit?” The answers included larger scale portable showers, soap, brushes, hand wash stations, change of clothing, water, refrigerators, bags for contaminated gear, spare SCBA, etc. A couple of respondents commented that existing hazmat decon units could be used.

Decontamination Kits

The above concept is primarily for structure fires involving more than one company or department. But, what about the smaller fires that require only one company or unit, such as a car fire or dumpster fire? A regional decontamination unit is probably not the solution. A more practical approach is that every engine company (and perhaps ladder companies and heavy rescues, depending on the department) should have a decont

Read more
RSS
First48334834483548364838484048414842Last

Theme picker

Search News Articles