Menu

WFC News

Posted: Oct 1, 2018

New Fire Trucks Delivered To Red Lake, Ponemah (MN)

The tribe ordered the two pumpers to serve the community areas of Ponemah and Red Lake with adequate fire safety and protection. Both grant funds and finance were acquired to make these purchases.

Four state-of-the-art ambulances were also purchased earlier this year, two for Red Lake and two for Ponemah, with a combination of a USDA Loan and Grant.

Read more
Posted: Oct 1, 2018

Rebuilt Neel (AL) Fire Station Larger, More Modern

The new station has 6,500 square feet, about 100 more square feet than the former site. It has higher ceilings and three drive-through bays.

“We no longer have to back up our trucks into the bays, which makes it a lot safer for everybody here,” he said. The bay doors are now 14 feet wide and 14 feet in height, replacing the 12-foot doors in the old building.

He said the department owns five vehicles and will park a 1993 GMC E-1 and 2012 International E-1 fire engines in the rebuilt station.

Read more
Posted: Oct 1, 2018

Firetruck Maker Eyes Expansion As It Approaches Two-Year Mark

A sister company in the family of Sutphen emergency vehicle manufacturers, Sutphen East began operations in its new home in the Sterling Technology & Business Park on Jan. 2, 2017.

After nearly two years and with 53 employees, the family-owned company now eyes expansion and currently is hiring. Inside the sprawling shop, near the front offices, a project whiteboard lists the fire departments waiting for trucks in a number of states including Indiana, Massachusetts and North Carolina.

Read more
Posted: Oct 1, 2018

Didn’t See That One Coming

Chris Mc Loone
 
Chris Mc Loone

In July, I authored an editorial titled “Just Consider It.” In it, I discussed the “Clean Cab Concept” for fire apparatus where departments are working to reduce firefighters’ exposure to contaminants, including carcinogens.

The Clean Cab Concept is multifaceted, with an almost a la carte selection of features that departments are free to mix and match. If your department has decided that its firefighters should step off the truck ready to go, then obviously from an operational standpoint it does not make sense to remove self-contained breathing apparatus (SCBA) from the cab to a location in an exterior compartment. I didn’t hear anything from anyone about it. But, what I did hear about was Robert Tutterow’s “Keeping It Safe” column from that month: “What’s with the Black Finish?”

In his column, Tutterow discussed a recent trend for fire departments to use a matte black finish on their fire apparatus. He said, “What about safety? Black is the least visible color, unless you live at the north or south pole. Being conspicuous as emergency responders with conspicuous apparatus is a safety issue.” I read the column, edited it, sent it to layout, and braced myself for the hate mail. But, all we received were positive comments. I wasn’t disappointed, but I was surprised.

In August, an apparatus manufacturer announced that a department was set to take delivery of several new rescue-pumpers spec’d with the Clean Cab Concept in mind. Notably, the department took the SCBA out of the cab. It wasn’t new for the department, just the most recent time it did it. We shared the story on social media. This time I was surprised—and a little disappointed.

No one, to my knowledge, has ever suggested that everyone now must yank all the SCBA out of the cabs. How many of us have gotten off a truck with SCBA donned, hoseline stretched to the front door, and then knelt on the ground to take our helmets off to lay them in front of us while we put our face pieces on, turned on the cylinders, put the hoods over the face piece harnesses, put the helmets back on, and then connected the regulators? How many articles have we run in this magazine and posted online that have stated that different apparatus or equipment features are local decisions, followed by statements asserting that whatever your local decision is, train on it?

There is no doubt in my mind that any department that decides to take its SCBA out of the cab will, if it is worth its salt, ensure that its personnel won’t lose time getting out of the cab, getting the SCBA out of the compartment, and donning it.

Am I saying that I think all SCBA should be taken out of the cab? No. There are other alternatives to help accomplish exposure reduction. But, I was surprised at the number of people who went after moving the SCBA. There were other features, like

Read more
Posted: Oct 1, 2018

Didn’t See That One Coming

Chris Mc Loone
 
Chris Mc Loone

In July, I authored an editorial titled “Just Consider It.” In it, I discussed the “Clean Cab Concept” for fire apparatus where departments are working to reduce firefighters’ exposure to contaminants, including carcinogens.

The Clean Cab Concept is multifaceted, with an almost a la carte selection of features that departments are free to mix and match. If your department has decided that its firefighters should step off the truck ready to go, then obviously from an operational standpoint it does not make sense to remove self-contained breathing apparatus (SCBA) from the cab to a location in an exterior compartment. I didn’t hear anything from anyone about it. But, what I did hear about was Robert Tutterow’s “Keeping It Safe” column from that month: “What’s with the Black Finish?”

In his column, Tutterow discussed a recent trend for fire departments to use a matte black finish on their fire apparatus. He said, “What about safety? Black is the least visible color, unless you live at the north or south pole. Being conspicuous as emergency responders with conspicuous apparatus is a safety issue.” I read the column, edited it, sent it to layout, and braced myself for the hate mail. But, all we received were positive comments. I wasn’t disappointed, but I was surprised.

In August, an apparatus manufacturer announced that a department was set to take delivery of several new rescue-pumpers spec’d with the Clean Cab Concept in mind. Notably, the department took the SCBA out of the cab. It wasn’t new for the department, just the most recent time it did it. We shared the story on social media. This time I was surprised—and a little disappointed.

No one, to my knowledge, has ever suggested that everyone now must yank all the SCBA out of the cabs. How many of us have gotten off a truck with SCBA donned, hoseline stretched to the front door, and then knelt on the ground to take our helmets off to lay them in front of us while we put our face pieces on, turned on the cylinders, put the hoods over the face piece harnesses, put the helmets back on, and then connected the regulators? How many articles have we run in this magazine and posted online that have stated that different apparatus or equipment features are local decisions, followed by statements asserting that whatever your local decision is, train on it?

There is no doubt in my mind that any department that decides to take its SCBA out of the cab will, if it is worth its salt, ensure that its personnel won’t lose time getting out of the cab, getting the SCBA out of the compartment, and donning it.

Am I saying that I think all SCBA should be taken out of the cab? No. There are other alternatives to help accomplish exposure reduction. But, I was surprised at the number of people who went after moving the SCBA. There were other features, like

Read more
RSS
First44454446444744484450445244534454Last

Theme picker

Search News Articles