Menu

WFC News

Posted: Feb 19, 2018

Apparatus Purchasing: 30 Days Is Not Enough Time To Bid on a Fire Truck

I believe there are three reasons to expedite the purchase of a new fire truck. Two are valid, and one isn’t.

The first and easiest to justify is when an emergency purchase is warranted to replace an essential rig that is unexpectedly and permanently placed out of service. An example would be when a department’s sole aerial ladder is no longer serviceable, a spare rig is not available, and mutual aid is not feasible. Second is when the purchasing authority has to expend funds within a certain time frame, such as with grant monies or when job-specific budgeted funding may expire (you don’t use it, you lose it). The last and perhaps a controversial reason is political. A member of the authority having jurisdiction (AHJ) or the fire department hierarchy may want a “feather in the cap” for electoral purposes. Let’s get a new rig on order or delivered before the elections; I need the votes. That is a crass statement and a calculated maneuver but one not unheard of. In most other instances, the purchasing process plods along at a pace convenient to the fire department. These are the instances addressed herein.

Apparatus purchasing committees (APCs) have been known to labor for well over a year to develop a set of purchasing specifications. That time frame is common in departments that purchase infrequently as well as in departments that do not have an administrative staff devoted to apparatus procurement. Unless it is a scenario similar to the three mentioned above, the AHJ seldom badgers an APC to step up the pace. No one seems to care about the length of time required to develop a set of specifications provided that the department specs exactly what it needs and wants. APCs are usually encouraged to take their time and get it right. Kudos to committees that investigate and evaluate.

NFPA 1901

National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) 1901, Standard for Automotive Fire Apparatus, Annex B, sentence B.3—Obtaining and Studying Proposals states, “When the specifications are complete, they should be distributed to apparatus manufacturers and contractors with a request for bids or proposals to furnish the specified apparatus. The request should specify a date, time, and place for the formal opening of the bids. This date should allow at least one month for the engineering departments of apparatus manufacturers to study the specifications and estimate the cost of the apparatus. More time could be required if engineering drawings of the proposed apparatus are required.” NFPA 1901 also states, “This annex is not part of the requirements of this NFPA document but is included for informational purposes only.”

Fire Apparatus Purchasing Handbook, by William C. Peters, states, “Most would agree that unless specifications are extremely complicated, 30 days should be sufficient and fair for all bidders to complete their work. If bids are accepted by mail, the time frame should be slightly longer to compensate for this process.”

The 30-day time frame, while generally accepted as a norm, is to my knowledge not a written requirement of any regulatory agency. No one knows where the historical 30-day figure originated or why it was chosen. It may be one of those unchallenged fire service traditions that has never been questioned. It should be.

Unawareness or Deceit?

After the technical nuts-and-bolts portion of purchasing specifications is completed, the front sheets (aka the boilerplate), including the basic legal requirements, are usually addressed. This is when and where the 30-day time frame is normally integrated

Read more
Posted: Feb 19, 2018

Apparatus Purchasing: 30 Days Is Not Enough Time To Bid on a Fire Truck

I believe there are three reasons to expedite the purchase of a new fire truck. Two are valid, and one isn’t.

The first and easiest to justify is when an emergency purchase is warranted to replace an essential rig that is unexpectedly and permanently placed out of service. An example would be when a department’s sole aerial ladder is no longer serviceable, a spare rig is not available, and mutual aid is not feasible. Second is when the purchasing authority has to expend funds within a certain time frame, such as with grant monies or when job-specific budgeted funding may expire (you don’t use it, you lose it). The last and perhaps a controversial reason is political. A member of the authority having jurisdiction (AHJ) or the fire department hierarchy may want a “feather in the cap” for electoral purposes. Let’s get a new rig on order or delivered before the elections; I need the votes. That is a crass statement and a calculated maneuver but one not unheard of. In most other instances, the purchasing process plods along at a pace convenient to the fire department. These are the instances addressed herein.

Apparatus purchasing committees (APCs) have been known to labor for well over a year to develop a set of purchasing specifications. That time frame is common in departments that purchase infrequently as well as in departments that do not have an administrative staff devoted to apparatus procurement. Unless it is a scenario similar to the three mentioned above, the AHJ seldom badgers an APC to step up the pace. No one seems to care about the length of time required to develop a set of specifications provided that the department specs exactly what it needs and wants. APCs are usually encouraged to take their time and get it right. Kudos to committees that investigate and evaluate.

NFPA 1901

National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) 1901, Standard for Automotive Fire Apparatus, Annex B, sentence B.3—Obtaining and Studying Proposals states, “When the specifications are complete, they should be distributed to apparatus manufacturers and contractors with a request for bids or proposals to furnish the specified apparatus. The request should specify a date, time, and place for the formal opening of the bids. This date should allow at least one month for the engineering departments of apparatus manufacturers to study the specifications and estimate the cost of the apparatus. More time could be required if engineering drawings of the proposed apparatus are required.” NFPA 1901 also states, “This annex is not part of the requirements of this NFPA document but is included for informational purposes only.”

Fire Apparatus Purchasing Handbook, by William C. Peters, states, “Most would agree that unless specifications are extremely complicated, 30 days should be sufficient and fair for all bidders to complete their work. If bids are accepted by mail, the time frame should be slightly longer to compensate for this process.”

The 30-day time frame, while generally accepted as a norm, is to my knowledge not a written requirement of any regulatory agency. No one knows where the historical 30-day figure originated or why it was chosen. It may be one of those unchallenged fire service traditions that has never been questioned. It should be.

Unawareness or Deceit?

After the technical nuts-and-bolts portion of purchasing specifications is completed, the front sheets (aka the boilerplate), including the basic legal requirements, are usually addressed. This is when and where the 30-day time frame is normally integrated

Read more
Posted: Feb 19, 2018

Apparatus Purchasing: 30 Days Is Not Enough Time To Bid on a Fire Truck

I believe there are three reasons to expedite the purchase of a new fire truck. Two are valid, and one isn’t.

The first and easiest to justify is when an emergency purchase is warranted to replace an essential rig that is unexpectedly and permanently placed out of service. An example would be when a department’s sole aerial ladder is no longer serviceable, a spare rig is not available, and mutual aid is not feasible. Second is when the purchasing authority has to expend funds within a certain time frame, such as with grant monies or when job-specific budgeted funding may expire (you don’t use it, you lose it). The last and perhaps a controversial reason is political. A member of the authority having jurisdiction (AHJ) or the fire department hierarchy may want a “feather in the cap” for electoral purposes. Let’s get a new rig on order or delivered before the elections; I need the votes. That is a crass statement and a calculated maneuver but one not unheard of. In most other instances, the purchasing process plods along at a pace convenient to the fire department. These are the instances addressed herein.

Apparatus purchasing committees (APCs) have been known to labor for well over a year to develop a set of purchasing specifications. That time frame is common in departments that purchase infrequently as well as in departments that do not have an administrative staff devoted to apparatus procurement. Unless it is a scenario similar to the three mentioned above, the AHJ seldom badgers an APC to step up the pace. No one seems to care about the length of time required to develop a set of specifications provided that the department specs exactly what it needs and wants. APCs are usually encouraged to take their time and get it right. Kudos to committees that investigate and evaluate.

NFPA 1901

National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) 1901, Standard for Automotive Fire Apparatus, Annex B, sentence B.3—Obtaining and Studying Proposals states, “When the specifications are complete, they should be distributed to apparatus manufacturers and contractors with a request for bids or proposals to furnish the specified apparatus. The request should specify a date, time, and place for the formal opening of the bids. This date should allow at least one month for the engineering departments of apparatus manufacturers to study the specifications and estimate the cost of the apparatus. More time could be required if engineering drawings of the proposed apparatus are required.” NFPA 1901 also states, “This annex is not part of the requirements of this NFPA document but is included for informational purposes only.”

Fire Apparatus Purchasing Handbook, by William C. Peters, states, “Most would agree that unless specifications are extremely complicated, 30 days should be sufficient and fair for all bidders to complete their work. If bids are accepted by mail, the time frame should be slightly longer to compensate for this process.”

The 30-day time frame, while generally accepted as a norm, is to my knowledge not a written requirement of any regulatory agency. No one knows where the historical 30-day figure originated or why it was chosen. It may be one of those unchallenged fire service traditions that has never been questioned. It should be.

Unawareness or Deceit?

After the technical nuts-and-bolts portion of purchasing specifications is completed, the front sheets (aka the boilerplate), including the basic legal requirements, are usually addressed. This is when and where the 30-day time frame is normally integrated

Read more
Posted: Feb 19, 2018

Fire Apparatus Headlights: A Lot to Know

 
fama forum By Sam Massa
Fire Apparatus Manufactures Association logo

Not all fire trucks need a pump. Not all trucks need a ladder.

But, one thing every fire apparatus needs is a set of headlights. In the United States, virtually every area of the fire apparatus has been enhanced, improved, and given significant funding by spec committees to improve the safety of the crews.

In an era of “Million-Dollar Fire Apparatus” equipped with the latest technology from many Fire Apparatus Manufacturers’ Association (FAMA) member companies, it is surprising that these purpose-built ultra-high-end tools are still sometimes fitted with headlights whose design has not changed significantly since the 1960s.

Headlight Platforms

When it comes to headlights for fire apparatus, there are two primary platforms apparatus manufacturers use: a molded headlight like you’d see on most passenger vehicles (less common) and a set of “sealed-beam” headlights, typically found in sets of four in the firefighting industry. The automotive-style molded headlight is often found on modern commercial cab chassis, and because of its mass production design focus, this design is less configurable by the apparatus specifying committee. The sealed-beam variety, however, is a platform with a seemingly never-ending list of configuration options. These options include halogen, HID, and LED source types with features like integrated halo park lamps, lens heaters, and pressure-equalizing vent valves.

When I ask firefighters, “If you could wave a magic wand, what would you change about the lighting on your rig?” I consistently hear, “THE HEADLIGHTS!” It surprises me every time, especially with the frequency with which I see apparatus committees specifying apparatus with $40,000 of scene lights and $200 of 1950s glass and halogen archaic headlights. Why? Often, it appears to boil down to cost. A set of four properly designed and certified LED headlights can cost anywhere from $800 to $1,500 per set. Are they worth it? That depends on what’s important to you. An LED headlight should never burn out, should produce significantly more light than a halogen, and should allow for operation in any weather for the life of the apparatus.

Headlight FAQs

As technologies continue to emerge, fire departments often look for ways to upgrade their fleets. A few common questions/comments fire apparatus manufacturers hear related to headlights follow.

“If I need to see while I am pulling up to a scene, I’ll just turn the brow lights on.”

Despite how tempting this may be, driving with auxiliary scene lighting switched to “on” above the level of the apparatus’ headlights is illegal in most states. In most situations, as vehicles approach a motorist traveling in the opposite direction, the headlights serve as an early indicator of their presence. Even around bends and winds in the road, other vehicles’ headlights serve to let you know, “Hey, we’re coming,” and allow you to prepare to meet them (and if your high beams are on, to switch them back to low-beam mode). When a fire truck is driving with its forward-facing scene lights on, the overwhelming power of those fixtures easily drowns out the early indication of the approach of that passing motorist. In turn, when the vehicles finally meet, the apparatus im

Read more
Posted: Feb 19, 2018

Fire Apparatus Headlights: A Lot to Know

 
fama forum By Sam Massa
Fire Apparatus Manufactures Association logo

Not all fire trucks need a pump. Not all trucks need a ladder.

But, one thing every fire apparatus needs is a set of headlights. In the United States, virtually every area of the fire apparatus has been enhanced, improved, and given significant funding by spec committees to improve the safety of the crews.

In an era of “Million-Dollar Fire Apparatus” equipped with the latest technology from many Fire Apparatus Manufacturers’ Association (FAMA) member companies, it is surprising that these purpose-built ultra-high-end tools are still sometimes fitted with headlights whose design has not changed significantly since the 1960s.

Headlight Platforms

When it comes to headlights for fire apparatus, there are two primary platforms apparatus manufacturers use: a molded headlight like you’d see on most passenger vehicles (less common) and a set of “sealed-beam” headlights, typically found in sets of four in the firefighting industry. The automotive-style molded headlight is often found on modern commercial cab chassis, and because of its mass production design focus, this design is less configurable by the apparatus specifying committee. The sealed-beam variety, however, is a platform with a seemingly never-ending list of configuration options. These options include halogen, HID, and LED source types with features like integrated halo park lamps, lens heaters, and pressure-equalizing vent valves.

When I ask firefighters, “If you could wave a magic wand, what would you change about the lighting on your rig?” I consistently hear, “THE HEADLIGHTS!” It surprises me every time, especially with the frequency with which I see apparatus committees specifying apparatus with $40,000 of scene lights and $200 of 1950s glass and halogen archaic headlights. Why? Often, it appears to boil down to cost. A set of four properly designed and certified LED headlights can cost anywhere from $800 to $1,500 per set. Are they worth it? That depends on what’s important to you. An LED headlight should never burn out, should produce significantly more light than a halogen, and should allow for operation in any weather for the life of the apparatus.

Headlight FAQs

As technologies continue to emerge, fire departments often look for ways to upgrade their fleets. A few common questions/comments fire apparatus manufacturers hear related to headlights follow.

“If I need to see while I am pulling up to a scene, I’ll just turn the brow lights on.”

Despite how tempting this may be, driving with auxiliary scene lighting switched to “on” above the level of the apparatus’ headlights is illegal in most states. In most situations, as vehicles approach a motorist traveling in the opposite direction, the headlights serve as an early indicator of their presence. Even around bends and winds in the road, other vehicles’ headlights serve to let you know, “Hey, we’re coming,” and allow you to prepare to meet them (and if your high beams are on, to switch them back to low-beam mode). When a fire truck is driving with its forward-facing scene lights on, the overwhelming power of those fixtures easily drowns out the early indication of the approach of that passing motorist. In turn, when the vehicles finally meet, the apparatus im

Read more
RSS
First50925093509450955097509951005101Last

Theme picker

Search News Articles