Fire departments across the country are grappling with a pivotal decision: Should they refurbish aging vehicles or replace them altogether?
With extended lead times—often ranging from 24 to 48 months—and limited funding, many departments are opting for refurbishment as a more cost-effective solution to meet their operational needs. But, is it the right choice for your department? This article explores the challenges departments face in making this decision, examining lead times, costs, and how refurbishment can extend the life of a fire apparatus.
THE EVOLVING STANDARDS FOR REFURBISHING FIRE APPARATUS
In 2024, a significant change in fire apparatus standards occurred with the “Emergency Response and Responder Safety Document Consolidation Plan.” National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) 1912, Standard for Fire Apparatus Refurbishing, is no longer a standalone document. Instead, it has been integrated into the newly consolidated NFPA 1910, Standard for the Inspection, Maintenance, Refurbishment, Testing, and Retirement of In-Service Emergency Vehicles and Marine Firefighting Vessels. This new standard incorporates NFPA 1911, Standard for the Inspection, Maintenance, Testing, and Retirement of In-Service Emergency Vehicles; 1925, Standard on Marine Fire-Fighting Vessels; and 1071, Standard for Emergency Vehicle Technician Professional Qualifications, to focus on the inspection, maintenance, and retirement of fire vehicles.
Although this article focuses primarily on fire apparatus refurbishment, understanding these updated regulations is essential when considering how to handle an aging apparatus.
REFURBISHING A 2006 SEAGRAVE PUMPER
Imagine this scenario: The chief of the XYZ Fire Department has just been informed that funding for a new replacement engine has been cut from the town’s budget. Faced with this unexpected challenge, the chief must now explore a more budget-friendly solution—refurbishment.
The truck committee initially considered several factors when specifying the needs for a new engine, including vehicle safety, operational efficiency, and technology upgrades. These same factors now apply to refurbishment decisions, with particular attention to the condition of the apparatus’s “good bones”—the frame, drivetrain, pump, and body. After conducting an extensive inspection of the 2006 Seagrave pumper, it was determined that the rig had a solid drivetrain and a good frame, though there was minor corrosion along the body and frame rails.
1 An extensive inspection of this 2006 Seagrave pumper revealed that the rig had a solid drivetrain and a good frame, though there was minor corrosion along the body and frame rails, making it a candidate for refurbishment. (Photo by Scott Poulton.)
The department outlined a scope of repairs that would extend the life of the vehicle by another five to 10 years. After receiving proposals from three contractors, the department awarded a refurbishment contract. Several weeks into the breakdown and inspections, it was confirmed that the scope of repairs was accurate, and no unexpected costs had emerged, even avoiding the need to use the department’s 30% contingency fund.
TWO LEVELS OF REFURBISHMENT
NFPA 1910 defines two main levels of refurbishment: Level I and Level II.
Chapter 3.3.194.1* states that Level I refurbishing is “the assembly of a new fire apparatus by the use of a new chassis frame, driving and crew compartment, front axle, steering and suspension components, and the use of either new components or components from an existing apparatus for the re