Menu

WFC News

Posted: Jul 2, 2019

An Ounce of Prevention

By David Cain, Deputy Chief of Operations, Boulder, CO (ret)

It has become very apparent that over the last 10 years technologies in the Fire Service are changing at rapid pace.  My recent trip to FDIC International was a reminder of how competition among manufacturers has created the latest and greatest technological advantage. Fire trucks, aerials, squads, brush trucks, tactical armored vehicles, communication vans and rehab trailers are changing every year. 

The race to have the next greatest whatever is ever-present and changing. Vehicles are not the only thing going through this race to outdo their competition. Turnout gear or bunker gear, whatever you want to call it, is also racing to the finish line. Add to that advancement in SCBA, medical equipment and many other items, and you now have a steady stream of potential change with a big price tag.

Not to be outdone, the software industry is also crushing our brains with programs to manage training, staffing, response, payroll, RMS, dispatching, narcotics controls and many other functions.  There is no magic bullet that can do all of this. However, increasingly reliable systems are available to address key parts of the equation. Cloud technology is rapidly becoming a tool of choice for many agencies to address a variety of needs.  The Cloud can reduce the need for many IT functions, and yes, security is assured with established providers demonstrating a solid track record.

So, the question is, how do we manage, track, test and account for all of this? The logical answer is building an organized system that will be maintained and tracked by a few people. It is inefficient and wasteful to have these tasks spread out among different people, namely firefighters.  At some point, the size of the department will determine the structure of managing assets and logistical support.

Depending on the size of the fire department, a planning/logistical Chief should be created.  I have seen many departments that have done this.  In many cases, the person in charge does not have to be a Chief or a uniformed person.  A civilian position could be created for an individual with the skill set to build a comprehensive system capable of detailed program tracking that serves as a safety net to ensure everything important is tracked and maintained.  

One key part of this equation looks at a department’s assets--including apparatus/vehicles, PPE, SCBA, Stations, narcotics, and critical assets.

  • Apparatus includes all first response units, including command vehicles. We also have staff vehicles, trailers, boats and other motorized units.
  • SCBA includes packs, bottles, masks, respirator and compressors and testing devices.
  • PPE includes turnout gear, hoods, gloves, boots, helmets and other personal protection-related items.
  • Stations need to be checked based on many factors that may vary from station to station—inventories within the stations, kitchen items, living and sleeping quarters items, etc.
  • Narcotics and EMS supplies.  Many departments do not have controlled meds, but those that do need to have a robust system of control, and it must be documentable on the spot when regulatory agencies or others come calling. This documentation can be critical to avoiding legal liability.
  • Critical assets include TICs, radios, power tools, batteries, etc.

This sounds like a lot and it is a big task to track, test, and account for all of the above. But, we cannot provide the best service possible or be totally accountable if we don’t know what we have, how it’s performing, and what needs to be addressed to ensure optimum performance and trackability. There is great saying that sums it up: “You cannot manage what you can’t measure.”  

I will add to that by saying that planning and finance are a big piece of g

Read more
Posted: Jul 2, 2019

Firefighters' and Instructors’ Absorption of PAHs and Benzene During Training Exercises

Introduction

Training fires may constitute a major portion of some firefighters’ occupational exposures to smoke. However, the magnitude and composition of those exposures are not well understood and may vary by the type of training scenario and fuels.

 

Objectives

To understand how structure fire training contributes to firefighters' and instructors’ select chemical exposures, we conducted biological monitoring during exercises involving combustion of pallet and straw and oriented strand board (OSB) or the use of simulated smoke.

 

Methods

Urine was analyzed for metabolites of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and breath was analyzed for volatile organic compounds (VOCs) including benzene.

 

Results

Median concentrations of nearly all PAH metabolites in urine increased from pre-to 3-hr post-training for each scenario and were highest for OSB, followed by pallet and straw, and then simulated smoke. For instructors who supervised three trainings per day, median concentrations increased at each collection. A single day of OSB exercises led to a 30-fold increase in 1-hydroxypyrene for instructors, culminating in a median end-of-shift concentration 3.5-fold greater than median levels measured from firefighters in a previous controlled-residential fire study. Breath concentrations of benzene increased 2 to 7-fold immediately after the training exercises (with the exception of simulated smoke training). Exposures were highest for the OSB scenario and instructors accumulated PAHs with repeated daily exercises.

 

Conclusions

Dermal absorption likely contributed to the biological levels as the respiratory route was well protected. Training academies should consider exposure risks as well as instructional objectives when selecting training exercises.

 

More

Read more
Posted: Jul 2, 2019

Firefighters’ Absorption of PAHs and VOCs During Controlled Residential Fires by Job Assignment and Fire Attack Tactic

Abstract

To better understand the absorption of combustion byproducts during firefighting, we performed biological monitoring (breath and urine) on firefighters who responded to controlled residential fires and examined the results by job assignment and fire attack tactic. Urine was analyzed for metabolites of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and breath was analyzed for volatile organic compounds (VOCs) including benzene. Median concentrations of PAH metabolites in urine increased from pre-firefighting to 3-h post firefighting for all job assignments. This change was greatest for firefighters assigned to attack and search with 2.3, 5.6, 3.9, and 1.4-fold median increases in pyrene, phenanthrene, naphthalene, and fluorene metabolites. Median exhaled breath concentrations of benzene increased 2-fold for attack and search firefighters (p < 0.01) and 1.4-fold for outside vent firefighters (p = 0.02). Compared to interior attack, transitional attack resulted in 50% less uptake of pyrene (p = 0.09), 36% less uptake phenanthrene (p = 0.052), and 20% less uptake of fluorene (p < 0.01). Dermal absorption likely contributed to firefighters’ exposures in this study. Firefighters’ exposures will vary by job assignment and can be reduced by employing a transitional fire attack when feasible.

 

Introduction

Structure fires typically involve furnishings and other items made of both natural and synthetic materials. These fires can produce hundreds of combustion byproducts, including benzene, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), acid gases, hydrogen cyanide, aldehydes, inorganic gases, and halogenated compounds [1,2,3,4,5]. Several of these compounds (e.g., benzene, benzo[a]pyrene, formaldehyde) are known or suspected human carcinogens [6,7,8]. Epidemiology studies suggest that firefighters have increased risk for numerous types of cancer [9,10,11,12,13] and the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) classified occupational exposure as a firefighter to be possibly carcinogenic to humans (Group 2B) [14]. Firefighters’ exposure to chemical carcinogens, particularly those associated with byproducts of combustion, has been postulated as a contributor to this increased risk [9].

Firefighters usually use self-contained breathing apparatus (SCBA) when conducting interior operations like fire attack (i.e., suppressing the seat of the fire) or search and rescue. However, firefighters may not always wear SCBA during exterior operations, such as incident command (i.e., directing and supervising the response), pump operation, or outside ventilation (i.e., opening walls or roof in an attempt to clear smoke from the structure). In addition, firefighters may remove SCBA during overhaul, which is the period of the response after fire suppression when firefighters search for smoldering items inside the structure. Although the inhalation route is protected by use of SCBA, the potential for dermal exposure still exists. Studies have found PAH particulates under firefighters’ protective ensembles (i.e., turnout gear) and contaminating the skin following fire responses [15,16,17,18,19,20] and PAHs can be readily absorbed through skin [21,22,23,24].

While many studies on firefighters have focused on PAHs and other solid-phase contaminants, few studies have examined the penetration of vapors into the interior space of the turnout gear. Wingfors et al. [15] found that naphthalene, the most volatile PAH, more readily penetrated the protective barriers of turnout gear than less volatile PAHs. Other volatile chemicals like benzene may also penetrate turnout gear. One component of turnout gear that likely provides very little attenuation for vapors is the hood, which is typically made of a couple layers of porous fabric, such as Nomex® (DuPont, Wilmington, DE).

Exposure of the neck to chemicals during firefighting could contribute to total body burden. Chemicals th

Read more
Posted: Jul 2, 2019

Understanding Airborne Contaminants Produced by Different Fuel Packages During Training Fires

Abstract

Fire training may expose firefighters and instructors to hazardous airborne chemicals that vary by the training fuel. We conducted area and personal air sampling during three instructional scenarios per day involving the burning of two types (designated as alpha and bravo) of oriented strand board (OSB), pallet and straw, or the use of simulated smoke, over a period of 5 days. Twenty-four firefighters and ten instructors participated. Firefighters participated in each scenario once (separated by about 48 hr) and instructors supervised three training exercise per scenarios (completed in 1 day). Personal air samples were analyzed for polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), volatile organic compounds (VOCs), and hydrogen cyanide during live-fire scenarios (excluding simulated smoke). Area air samples were analyzed for acid gases, aldehydes, isocyanates, and VOCs for all scenarios. For the live-fire scenarios, median personal air concentrations of benzene and PAHs exceeded applicable short-term exposure limits and were higher among firefighters than instructors. When comparing results by type of fuel, personal air concentrations of benzene and PAHs were higher for bravo OSB compared to other fuels. Median area air concentrations of aldehydes and isocyanates were also highest during the bravo OSB scenario, while pallet and straw produced the highest median concentrations of certain VOCs and acid gases. These results suggest usage of self-contained breathing apparatus (SCBA) by both instructors and firefighters is essential during training fires to reduce potential inhalation exposure. Efforts should be taken to clean skin and clothing as soon as possible after live-fire training to limit dermal absorption as well.

 

Introduction

Firefighters are occupationally exposed to a number of airborne pollutants and contaminants during emergency fire responses, including polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), volatile organic compounds (VOCs), polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), dioxins, plasticizers, flame retardants, hydrogen cyanide (HCN), hydrogen chloride, and other respirable particulates. Some of these compounds may also be produced during live-fire training, and may contribute substantially to firefighters’ exposure over their career, depending in part on the relative amount of time spent in training vs. emergency responses. Occupational exposure during training may also depend on the fuel package used in training, as the pyrolysis of OSB is different than the pyrolysis of pallet and straw.

A meta-analysis conducted in 2006 indicated that firefighters have increased risk of testicular, multiple myeloma, non-Hodgkins lymphoma, and prostate cancer. Following this meta-analysis, Daniels et al. conducted a retrospective study of 30,000 firefighters and found increased mortality and incidence risk for cancers of the esophagus, intestine, lung, kidney, and oral cavity, as well as mesothelioma. Daniels et al. also found a dose-response relationship between fire-runs and leukemia and fire hours and lung cancer. While a number of risk factors increase cancer risks, firefighters’ inhalation exposure to toxic combustion products like PAHs and benzene are thought to play an important role.

Many fire departments require live-fire training for their members in order to maintain competency and certifications. Often, firefighters and officers serve as instructors. Training fires may account for a large portion of firefighters and instructors’ total occupational exposure to airborne contaminants, particularly for instructors who may see three to five live fires per day over a period of several weeks or even months. These exposures may increase their risk of cancer, cardiovascular disease, and other chronic diseases. A recent study of fire instructors in Australia found a dose-response relationship between estimated training exposures and cancer incidence.

Fuels us

Read more
Posted: Jul 2, 2019

Publications Highlight Firefighters' Exposures

Firefighters conduct a training fire at an acquired structure

Above, firefighters conduct a training fire at an acquired structure. Photo by Tim Olk.

Several recently published articles detail firefighters' exposure to hydrocarbons and other substances during fire operations. Dr. Kenneth Fent and his colleagues just published three articles from collaborative research with the Illinois Fire Service Institute and Underwriters Laboratories. These articles are open access and can be downloaded below.

Firefighters’ absorption of PAHs and VOCs during controlled residential fires by job assignment and fire attack tactic: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41370-019-0145-2

In the above study in the journal Nature, Dr. Fent and his colleagues performed biological monitoring (breath and urine) on firefighters who responded to controlled residential fires and examined the results by job assignment and fire attack tactic. This was undertaken to better understand the absorption of combustion byproducts during firefighting.

Urine was analyzed for metabolites of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and breath was analyzed for volatile organic compounds (VOCs) including benzene. Median concentrations of PAH metabolites in urine increased from pre-firefighting to 3-h post firefighting for all job assignments. This change was greatest for firefighters assigned to attack and search with 2.3, 5.6, 3.9, and 1.4-fold median increases in pyrene, phenanthrene, naphthalene, and fluorene metabolites.

Dermal absorption likely contributed to firefighters’ exposures in this study. Firefighters’ exposures will vary by job assignment and can be reduced by employing a transitional fire attack when feasible.

Read more HERE.

Understanding airborne contaminants produced by different fuel packages during training fires: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/15459624.2019.1617870

Fire training may expose firefighters and instructors to hazardous airborne chemicals that vary by the training fuel. Kenneth W. Fent, Alexander Mayer ORCID Icon, Stephen Bertke, Steve Kerber, Denise Smith, and Gavin P. Horn conducted area and personal air sampling during three instructional scenarios per day involving the burning of two types (designated as alpha and bravo) of oriented strand board (OSB), pallet and straw, or the use of simulated smoke, over a period of 5 days. Twenty-four firefighters and ten instructors participated.

Firefighters participated in each scenario once (separated by about 48 hr) and instructors supervised three training exercise per scenarios (completed in 1 day). Personal air samples were analyzed for polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), volatile organic compounds (VOCs), and hydrogen cyanide during live-fire scenarios (excluding simulated smoke). Area air samples were analyzed for acid gases, aldehydes, isocyanates, and VOCs for all scenarios.

For the live-fire scenarios, median personal air concentrations of benzene and PAHs exceeded applicable short-term exposure limits and were higher among firefighters than instructors. When comparing results by type of fuel, personal air concentrations of benzene and PAHs were higher for bravo OSB compared to other fuels. Median area air concentrations of aldehydes and isocyanates were also highest during the bravo OSB scenario, while pallet and straw produced the highest median concentrations of certain VOCs and acid gases.

<
Read more
RSS
First37923793379437953797379938003801Last

Theme picker

Search News Articles