Menu

WFC News

Posted: Mar 1, 2019

Eight Streamlined and Compact Pumpers Delivered to the San Francisco (CA) Fire Department

1903FA_064-065

 
 
special Delivery | Alan M. Petrillo
 

Eight Streamlined and Compact Pumpers Delivered to the San Francisco (CA) Fire Department

Hilly terrain and many tight and congested streets and alleyways made the case for the San Francisco (CA) Fire Department to specify a specially designed engine with the shortest wheelbase possible and also the tightest turning radius.

The department got exactly what it wanted from Ferrara Fire Apparatus. The manufacturer recently delivered eight streamlined, compact pumpers to San Francisco that allow the department to better negotiate congested streets and alleys and handle the city’s hilly terrain.

SAN FRANCISCO-SPECIFIC

Anthony Rivera, assistant deputy chief of the San Francisco Fire Department, says the department has unique needs for its vehicles. “We need higher horsepower (hp) and higher torque engines because of the steep hills,” Rivera points out, “and we also need our vehicles to have a higher angle of approach and departure for the same reason. We have a minimum requirement for ground level clearance too because any components hanging below a certain height will get ripped off when going up or down hills.”

Another issue facing the department, Rivera says, was extremely narrow alleyways filled with 100-year-old wooden multiresidential units, so the department needed to have engines with short wheelbases and overall lengths that could negotiate those difficult areas.

Ferrara Fire Apparatus recently supplied eight custom pumpers to the San Francisco (CA) Fire Department on Igniter chassis with 169-inch wheelbases and 96-inch-wide flat-roof cabs with seating for six firefighters.

1 Ferrara Fire Apparatus recently supplied eight custom pumpers to the San Francisco (CA) Fire Department on Igniter chassis with 169-inch wheelbases and 96-inch-wide flat-roof cabs with seating for six firefighters. (Photos 1-6 courtesy of Ferrara Fire Apparatus.)

To help reduce the overall profile of the pumpers, Ferrara recessed two air horns, a Code 3 speaker, and a Screaming Eagle flush-mounted mechanical siren in the painted steel frame rail bumpers.

2 To help reduce the overall profile of the pumpers, Ferrara recessed two air horns, a Code 3 speaker, and a Screaming Eagle flush-mounted mechanical siren in the painted steel frame rail bumpers.

The hoseb
	</div>
	<a class=Read more
Posted: Mar 1, 2019

Eight Streamlined and Compact Pumpers Delivered to the San Francisco (CA) Fire Department

1903FA_064-065

 
 
special Delivery | Alan M. Petrillo
 

Eight Streamlined and Compact Pumpers Delivered to the San Francisco (CA) Fire Department

Hilly terrain and many tight and congested streets and alleyways made the case for the San Francisco (CA) Fire Department to specify a specially designed engine with the shortest wheelbase possible and also the tightest turning radius.

The department got exactly what it wanted from Ferrara Fire Apparatus. The manufacturer recently delivered eight streamlined, compact pumpers to San Francisco that allow the department to better negotiate congested streets and alleys and handle the city’s hilly terrain.

SAN FRANCISCO-SPECIFIC

Anthony Rivera, assistant deputy chief of the San Francisco Fire Department, says the department has unique needs for its vehicles. “We need higher horsepower (hp) and higher torque engines because of the steep hills,” Rivera points out, “and we also need our vehicles to have a higher angle of approach and departure for the same reason. We have a minimum requirement for ground level clearance too because any components hanging below a certain height will get ripped off when going up or down hills.”

Another issue facing the department, Rivera says, was extremely narrow alleyways filled with 100-year-old wooden multiresidential units, so the department needed to have engines with short wheelbases and overall lengths that could negotiate those difficult areas.

Ferrara Fire Apparatus recently supplied eight custom pumpers to the San Francisco (CA) Fire Department on Igniter chassis with 169-inch wheelbases and 96-inch-wide flat-roof cabs with seating for six firefighters.

1 Ferrara Fire Apparatus recently supplied eight custom pumpers to the San Francisco (CA) Fire Department on Igniter chassis with 169-inch wheelbases and 96-inch-wide flat-roof cabs with seating for six firefighters. (Photos 1-6 courtesy of Ferrara Fire Apparatus.)

To help reduce the overall profile of the pumpers, Ferrara recessed two air horns, a Code 3 speaker, and a Screaming Eagle flush-mounted mechanical siren in the painted steel frame rail bumpers.

2 To help reduce the overall profile of the pumpers, Ferrara recessed two air horns, a Code 3 speaker, and a Screaming Eagle flush-mounted mechanical siren in the painted steel frame rail bumpers.

The hoseb
	</div>
	<a class=Read more
Posted: Mar 1, 2019

Rekindle vs. Due Diligence

1903FA_058-059

 
 
Thermal Imaging | Manfred Kihn
 

Rekindle vs. Due Diligence

I read an article recently where a fire department is facing a $1.9-million lawsuit ... OUCH! How does that happen in today’s technology-driven society that has equipped the fire service with the most advanced tools for its firefighters?

Carl Nix

In this column, I’m going to discuss rekindle and due diligence and what steps the fire department could have taken to prevent this lawsuit from happening.

Let me summarize the details of the circumstances that occurred to elicit this lawsuit: A structure fire had occurred several streets over from the plaintiff’s residence, at which time some embers had ignited on the roof of the resident’s house at 1:40 a.m. The fire department had responded and extinguished the fire on the roof and with minimal damage the family could reenter and stay in their home. At 7:30 a.m., the homeowners woke to the roof being on fire and once again the fire department responded and extinguished the roof fire, but this time a more significant amount of damage occurred, making the home uninhabitable. At 7:15 p.m., the fire department was called for a third fire that had ignited from the same roof of the plaintiff’s home, causing the home to sustain even further damage.

In the court documents, the plaintiff alleged that the defendants:

  1. Failed to inspect all areas of the house where the possibility of the presence of a residual fire, remaining embers, or smoldering fuel might exist when they knew—or should have known—such a set of circumstances was likely to exist.
  2. Failed to ensure that the initial fire and rekindle were completely extinguished prior to leaving the house and handing over responsibility for the house to the plaintiffs.
  3. Failed to conduct a reasonable, or any, fire watch at the house following the initial fire and rekindle or otherwise failed to follow a reasonable, or any, deployment process so that a fire watch could be maintained.
  4. Failed to exercise reasonable care or take adequate, or any, precautions, such as maintaining a fire watch, in circumstances where the house had a high fuel load because of its old and dry cedar-shake roof, which they knew, or should have known, could be easily susceptible to a rekindle.

Now, what could the fire department have done to prevent this from happening by using due diligence? Firefighters could have used their thermal imaging camera (TIC). When the fire department responded the first time at 1:40 a.m., members should have used the TIC to conduct a 360° search around the structure based on information that the embers had ignited the roof from several streets away. The firefighters should have asked what else might have been burning that was not detected by the naked

Read more
Posted: Mar 1, 2019

Rekindle vs. Due Diligence

1903FA_058-059

 
 
Thermal Imaging | Manfred Kihn
 

Rekindle vs. Due Diligence

I read an article recently where a fire department is facing a $1.9-million lawsuit ... OUCH! How does that happen in today’s technology-driven society that has equipped the fire service with the most advanced tools for its firefighters?

Carl Nix

In this column, I’m going to discuss rekindle and due diligence and what steps the fire department could have taken to prevent this lawsuit from happening.

Let me summarize the details of the circumstances that occurred to elicit this lawsuit: A structure fire had occurred several streets over from the plaintiff’s residence, at which time some embers had ignited on the roof of the resident’s house at 1:40 a.m. The fire department had responded and extinguished the fire on the roof and with minimal damage the family could reenter and stay in their home. At 7:30 a.m., the homeowners woke to the roof being on fire and once again the fire department responded and extinguished the roof fire, but this time a more significant amount of damage occurred, making the home uninhabitable. At 7:15 p.m., the fire department was called for a third fire that had ignited from the same roof of the plaintiff’s home, causing the home to sustain even further damage.

In the court documents, the plaintiff alleged that the defendants:

  1. Failed to inspect all areas of the house where the possibility of the presence of a residual fire, remaining embers, or smoldering fuel might exist when they knew—or should have known—such a set of circumstances was likely to exist.
  2. Failed to ensure that the initial fire and rekindle were completely extinguished prior to leaving the house and handing over responsibility for the house to the plaintiffs.
  3. Failed to conduct a reasonable, or any, fire watch at the house following the initial fire and rekindle or otherwise failed to follow a reasonable, or any, deployment process so that a fire watch could be maintained.
  4. Failed to exercise reasonable care or take adequate, or any, precautions, such as maintaining a fire watch, in circumstances where the house had a high fuel load because of its old and dry cedar-shake roof, which they knew, or should have known, could be easily susceptible to a rekindle.

Now, what could the fire department have done to prevent this from happening by using due diligence? Firefighters could have used their thermal imaging camera (TIC). When the fire department responded the first time at 1:40 a.m., members should have used the TIC to conduct a 360° search around the structure based on information that the embers had ignited the roof from several streets away. The firefighters should have asked what else might have been burning that was not detected by the naked

Read more
Posted: Mar 1, 2019

Improving Skills in Water Application

1903FA_042-043

 
 
chief concerns | Richard Marinucci
 

Improving Skills in Water Application

Putting water on the fire quickly remains the best way to suppress almost all fires. It is one reason automatic sprinklers are so effective. They catch the fire while it is small enough to be controlled with minimal water.

Richard Marinucci

Water application may also be the best way to effect a rescue. It also improves firefighter safety by not only making conditions better but also shortening exposure time. Studies continue to show that conditions inside the structure improve dramatically when the environment is cooled. One feature of water is that it absorbs a great deal of heat when converting to steam. Of course, the steam can cause discomfort to interior firefighters. The key to being successful is applying the right amount of water in the quickest possible way. This is true whether you are in the offensive or defensive mode or in a transitional attack.

Water application involves a source, pump (unless you are still in the bucket brigade mode!), hoses and appliances, staffing, and the skill level of firefighting companies. Engine companies are generally tasked with water application, especially in the early stages of a fire. Trucks may assume the role, particularly in defensive operations. Essentially, the challenge is to overcome the Btus being generated by the fire. In the fire growth model, the fire begins in the incipient stage and builds to its peak and then deteriorates. There can be a vent-limited phase and explosive fire growth in modern fires with modern contents. Regardless, the point is that water application must match the phase of the fire. In some cases, the fire can be extinguished during the growth phase and in others the declining phase. Getting the right amount of water in the moments that matter will be the determinant.

TRAINING

Anyone who has ever read any of my columns on a regular basis knows that I think training is the most important aspect of any operation, and the more an organization commits to regular, quality training, the better the outcomes regardless of which part of the job you are involved in. For water delivery, it requires competence in hose deployment, nozzle usage, and appliances. The size of the hose, including attack and supply lines, is an important consideration. Staffing will also affect operations including efficiencies. One question to ask yourself is, “How long can I expect it to take to get water flowing from the various lines carried on the engine?” There must be an established standard, and crews must be held to that standard. This varies by line size and staffing. For example, more people are required to advance a 2½-inch line than a 1¾-inch line. If maneuverability is an issue, this has to be considered in the decision making. This would also apply to supply lines. If a good estimate is made, better decisions will be made. The choices can vary based on the amount of fire showing, water needs, and the time needed to deploy lines. A smaller line may make sense based on these factors and the need to be more mobile in moving lines. If you know some of t

Read more
RSS
First40094010401140124014401640174018Last

Theme picker

Search News Articles